Top 4 threats against America: the good and bad news

America’s top spy chiefs and intelligence experts come together every year to share their best guesses about the biggest threats that will face the country in the year ahead. Here are the top four pieces of good and bad news to come out of the annual threat-assessment hearing in Congress Tuesday.

2. Iran: bad news

Parspix/Abaca Press/MCT
Iran fires a Shahab 3 missile in this 2006 file photo. Iran probably has ballistic missiles that could strike Israel, hit a US vessel in the Persian Gulf, or reach southern Europe.

Iran continues to expand its uranium enrichment capabilities, which could be used for weapons.

Intelligence officials say that Iran would likely choose missile delivery as “its preferred method of delivering a nuclear weapon,” according to the assessment. Iran already has the largest inventory of ballistic missiles in the Middle East, “and it is expanding the scale, reach, and sophistication of its ballistic missile forces, many of which are inherently capable of carrying a nuclear payload." 

The threat assessment expressed alarm at what it cited as the 2011 plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador to the United States. The attempt “shows that some Iranian officials – probably including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei – have changed their calculus and are now more willing to conduct an attack in the United States in response to real or perceived US actions that threaten the regime.”

The assessment also warned of concerns “about Iranian plotting against US or allied interests overseas.” Whether they act “will be shaped by Tehran’s evaluation of the costs it bears for the plot against the Ambassador,” the assessment notes, “as well as Iranian leaders’ perceptions of US threats against the regime.”

2 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.