Why a loss in Wisconsin matters more to Trump than Clinton

Based on the politics of momentum, the results of Wisconsin's primary will impact the Republican race – and Donald Trump – more than the Democratic campaign. 

|
Jim Young/Reuters
US Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump greets supporters at a campaign rally in De Pere, Wisconsin, United States, March 30. Based on the politics of momentum, the results of Wisconsin's primary will impact the Republican race more than the Democratic campaign.

The current polls suggest the Wisconsin primaries may not go to the frontrunners – Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

But a Badger state loss could hurt Mr. Trump more than it does Mrs. Clinton.

With more than 20 state primaries or caucuses remaining, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders is favored to win Tuesday's Democratic primary in Wisconsin 49-43 over national frontrunner Hillary Clinton, according to a Thursday poll from Public Policy Polling. Although Clinton leads among Democrats, the state's independent voters favor her rival. 

Republican voters in Wisconsin have better all-around opinions of Republican candidates Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Ohio Gov. John Kasich than they do of Republican frontrunner Donald Trump. Polls show Mr. Cruz receiving 38 percent of the vote, with 37 percent for Mr. Trump and 17 for Mr. Kasich, though some polls show Cruz receiving even more votes than that. 

"This is the first poll we’ve ever done where we didn’t [see] Trump with the most locked in base of support," pollsters wrote. 

Clinton has won enough states and been promised enough "superdelegates" that losing Wisconsin alone – with its 96 Democratic delegates – will not cost her the nomination unless Senator Sanders has blowout success in the remaining states.

During an appearance alongside Cruz, however, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) told voters a Cruz win would change the race's momentum. That could be more than political grandstanding.

Wisconsin is a "winner-take-most" state, meaning Cruz could receive nearly all the 42 Republican delegates at the convention. Because Trump currently has 48 percent of all delegates awarded, the Associated Press reported, he would need 57 percent of delegates in remaining states in order to take a majority of the 1,237-delegate total and stave off a Republican Party leadership calling for a brokered convention.

If Trump fails to get the majority of delegates, the momentum of Cruz (or Kasich) going into to the convention could swing delegates. 

In a March poll, many Republicans who voted for someone other than Trump in a state primary said his candidacy would be a non-starter, The Christian Science Monitor's Linda Feldmann reported. Over 60 percent said they would consider voting for a third-party candidate if he won the Republican nomination, and 45 percent said they would definitely not vote for Trump in November. 

Although Mr. Sanders has been more successful than anyone expected, neither the Vermont senator nor his following is calling for an electoral revolt. But among Republicans, talk of a contested or brokered convention abounds as a way of preventing that 45 percent from either staying home or splitting the vote during the November election. If the Republican Party leadership cannot use solid numbers to contest Trump's candidacy, however, he will likely still have a good case for any effort to deny him the nomination.

“A contested convention remains a 50-50 proposition, but should Trump fall just shy of the magic number, the GOP will be contesting him at its own peril,” Republican strategist Ford O’Connell told The Christian Science Monitor in March.

House Speaker Paul Ryan (R), himself a representative from Wisconsin, has carefully avoided direct criticism of presidential candidates and insists he is keeping options open for the Republican Party

"People say, 'What about the contested convention?' " Ryan said in an interview with CNBC. "I say, well, there are a lot of people running for president. We'll see. Who knows?"

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why a loss in Wisconsin matters more to Trump than Clinton
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0402/Why-a-loss-in-Wisconsin-matters-more-to-Trump-than-Clinton
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe