Cautiously, GOP establishment is warming to Trump

Some party leaders sound resigned to a Donald Trump nomination, others hopeful. Either way, Mr. Trump still has work to do.

|
Joe Skipper/Reuters
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus speaks during a luncheon at the Republican National Committee Spring Meeting at the Diplomat Resort in Hollywood, Fla., Thursday.

Donald Trump didn’t come to Hollywood, Fla., personally to woo the Republican National Committee this week at its spring meeting, unlike the other two GOP presidential contenders.

Instead, he sent the anti-Trump – retired neurosurgeon and former candidate Ben Carson, who is as soothing as Trump is brash – and his new, more professional campaign team.

Maybe that was the right call. The ultimate outsider stayed on the outside and on the campaign trail, holding rallies and building toward another big expected haul of delegates in next Tuesday’s northeastern primaries. Here with the insiders, RNC members from all 56 states and territories, plus state party leaders, there was an unmistakable sense that a Trump nomination, if not inevitable, is now the probable outcome at the Republican convention in July.

And they’re OK with that. For some, that conclusion comes with a tinge of resignation. For others, there was a “look on the bright side” element to their analysis. Look at the massive turnout in the GOP primaries and all the problems likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has, they note – starting with questions about her honesty and the rise of democratic socialist Bernie Sanders, with his fundraising and massive crowds. And look at Trump’s ability to electrify supporters, a skill Mrs. Clinton lacks, they add.

But Trump still has work ahead. He may well finish the primaries in June without enough convention delegates to lock up on the nomination. In that case, “he’ll still have homework to do,” says Jonathan Barnett, Republican national committeeman from Arkansas.

“He’s going to have to get more friendly and start being nicer to the party people, nicer to the opposing candidates and the campaigns,” says Mr. Barnett, who is pledged to Trump on the first ballot. “If you can’t bring people together, you can’t build a coalition, and if you can’t build a coalition you can’t lead.”

Barnett attended the Trump reception, where Dr. Carson spoke and where Trump’s new top campaign advisers, Paul Manafort and Rick Wiley, made the case for why Trump would be the strongest general election candidate.

Press were not allowed in the room, but others who were there said the campaign laid out a map that showed Trump competitive in blue states such as New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Illinois – an assertion that party veterans greeted skeptically.

Trump, a team player?

But first things first: For Trump to win enough delegates at the convention, he’ll need party regulars on his side. Ditto if he wins the nomination; the man who answers to no one will need the very insiders he disdains to work with him and for him. For starters, that means dropping the rhetoric trashing the RNC and what he calls the “rigged” nomination process.

“We’ve talked about that [with Trump] on a number of occasions,” Carson told reporters before the reception. “He’s trying to moderate, he’s getting better. It doesn’t happen overnight.”

RNC veteran Henry Barbour says he gets what Trump is doing, even if he disagrees – and he’s now willing to vote for him in November.

“I’ve now gotten to the point where I’m OK” with a Trump nomination, says Mr. Barbour, the RNC committeeman from Mississippi and co-author of the RNC’s 2013 report on how to expand the party’s appeal and retake the presidency. “I’m going to support our nominee. That’s not to say I can’t change my mind, but I think I’m typical. The guy irks me at times, but I get that he’s doing his populist gig, and he’s trying to win.”

Still, Trump’s trash talk of the RNC “hurts the institution,” adds Barbour, who backed first Rick Perry, then Marco Rubio, and is now uncommitted. “I think he would do better to talk about bringing Republicans together on the issues that unite us.”

And that, he says, would go a long way toward softening the opposition to Trump among the GOP elite as well as rank-and-file voters. “If Donald Trump is our nominee,” he says, “I think a lot of people who today say I’d never vote for Trump will get over that in September and October when they think about what a Hillary Clinton would mean to our country.”

Other RNC members are less hesitant about backing Trump in November.

What insiders are saying

“I feel great,” says Ron Kaufman, the RNC committeeman from Massachusetts who originally backed Jeb Bush. “I’m OK with whoever the nominee is going to be.”

Mr. Kaufman cites as positives the historically high turnout in Republican primaries and huge viewership for the debates. “Listen, the party that has problems is the Democrats,” he says. “Clinton is the presumptive nominee, and yet dead-man walking Bernie Sanders has outraised her for the fourth month in a row by tens of millions of dollars.”

Kaufman acknowledges that the highly watched debates haven’t always helped the party’s image. “We can’t control the candidates,” he says.

Another RNC member, Paul Reynolds of Alabama, says the content of the debates became problematic a few times, and suggests instituting a penalty system for rhetoric that goes over the line. But he acknowledges that “you get into a slippery slope when you try to do anything on the content.”

Mr. Reynolds, a bound delegate for Trump, makes clear that he’s not anti-Ted Cruz. And he says the reception with Trump’s advisers was cordial. “It was bridge-building, taking care of some frayed nerves and a few egos that had gotten bruised,” he says.

As for being a Trump delegate, he adds, “it doesn’t bother me at all. We just want to get everything over and get into the general election so we can start focusing.”

Of course, not everyone at The Diplomat seaside resort in Hollywood, where the RNC convened, was ready to give in to Trump-mentum. Advisers to both Senator Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich roamed the corridors and meeting rooms, wooing RNC members and state party chairs – all of whom are also convention delegates. Cruz and Governor Kasich both also appeared in person, making their case to the party elite and to the press. Electability and more faithful adherence to GOP principles were top arguments.

“I think we made a good impression on most,” says Saul Anuzis, delegate wrangler for Cruz.

And it was clear, in interviews with these most active of Republican activists, that if Trump can’t win on the first ballot, it will be very difficult, if not impossible, for him to win on the second or third.

Barnett of Arkansas originally backed his state’s former governor, Mike Huckabee, for president, but is a Trump delegate, at least for the first ballot.

And what about after that?

“As of now, I’d vote for Trump on the second ballot, most likely – unless I had a reason not to,” Barnett says. “And that’s up to him.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Cautiously, GOP establishment is warming to Trump
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2016/0422/Cautiously-GOP-establishment-is-warming-to-Trump
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe