Skip to footer

Mitt Romney's five biggest assets as GOP nominee

Typically, an election with an incumbent president on the ballot is a referendum on him. But President Obama is trying to turn the election into a choice, saying in effect that America's problems will get much worse under the other guy. So what does Mitt Romney bring to the table? Here are five assets. 

2. 2002 Olympic Winter Games

Douglas C. Pizac/AP/File
Mitt Romney, who served as the Salt Lake Organizing Committee president for the 2002 Winter Olympics, looks on as Olympic medalist Andy Gabel demonstrates how to buy tickets on the Internet at a news conference in Salt Lake City in this May 2000 file photo.

  • By Linda Feldmann Staff writer

Romney was recruited in 1999 to take over leadership of the troubled 2002 winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, which is perhaps the ultimate turnaround on his résumé. The heads of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee (SLOC) had resigned amid accusations that members of the International Olympic Committee had been bribed. What’s more, the Games were in financial trouble – running short by $379 million – and faced being scaled back or leaving Salt Lake City altogether.

Romney revamped the SLOC leadership and boosted fundraising, and in the end, the Games were a sports and marketing success. The organizing committee wound up with a multimillion-dollar surplus, and the events were viewed by 2 billion people across the globe.

“I led an Olympics out of the shadows of scandal,” Romney said in February.

Romney detractors point out that he had lobbied for and received some $600 million in federal earmarks for the Games, much of it for security in the wake of 9/11. An additional $1.1 billion in government funds was spent on infrastructure improvements, like roads and bridges, according to the Associated Press.

But in the end, the Olympics are viewed positively by most Americans, and Romney’s lead role in saving the 2002 Winter Games is a plus.

2 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.