Obama vs. Romney 101: 4 ways they differ on China

China's rise has led President Obama to “pivot” his foreign policy toward Asia, hoping to enhance US power and expand its cooperation with China. Romney speaks more in terms of confronting a country whose interests often clash with those of the US. 

2. China as economic rival

M. Spencer Green/AP
Hanjuan Jin (c.) leaves the federal courthouse Aug. 29, 2012, in Chicago, after being sentenced to four years in prison for stealing trade secrets from Motorola.

Is China an economic competitor to be treated like a big boy in the international system, or is it still a developing country that must focus domestically on the employment needs of a population of more than 1 billion people?

China pleads the latter – but both Obama and Romney go with the former and see a “get tough” policy toward China as a way to impel it to become a more responsible player in the international economic system.

The Obama administration has stepped up the slapping of punitive trade measures on China this year, from tariffs on Chinese solar cells to sharply higher duties on wind-power generation towers. Obama boasted in May that he was lodging trade complaints against China “at twice the rate” of the Bush administration.

The administration has also addressed the increasingly prominent issues of corporate espionage, hacking, and intellectual property theft – of everything from American software to Hollywood movies – in its broad-based “strategic dialogue” with Chinese officials.

In response, Romney says “dialogue" – which he derides as a weak hallmark of Obama diplomacy – has not worked with China on economic issues any better than it has with Iran on its nuclear program or with Russia on strategic issues.

As recently as 2010, Romney criticized Obama’s trade measures against China as protectionist, but in last year’s Republican primaries, he took the opposite tack. In fact, he took such an aggressive tone with China that fellow Republican candidate John Huntsman (Obama’s former ambassador to China) accused him of China-bashing and said his approach would risk setting off a damaging trade war with the US’s second-largest trading partner.

But Romney has not backed off, and aides highlight his plan for “robust” confrontation with China over trade as a key component of their candidate’s economic program and a major difference with Obama.

Romney would also pursue a trade pact with the countries of the Pacific region – something the Obama administration is already doing – where China has significant economic ties. Romney aides say China would not be invited to join such a pact, but that membership at some point down the road would be held out as an incentive for China to begin acting as a more responsible player in the international economic system.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.