Pentagon braces for furloughs in sequester: How big a hit to economy?

Thousands of Defense Department civilian employees could be furloughed if Congress proceeds with the automatic federal spending cuts poised to take effect in March under the sequester.

|
Public Opinion, Markell DeLoatch/AP
Letterkenny Army Depot in Chambersburg, Pa., and other military installations may be forced to furlough civilian employees if Congress proceeds with the automatic federal spending cuts that are poised to take effect in March.

The Defense Department has put its hundreds of thousands of civilian employees on notice: They will probably face steep pay cuts under a furlough program if Congress proceeds with the automatic federal spending cuts that are poised to take effect in March.

The furloughs would come alongside other big defense cuts, due to the so-called budget sequester, that would affect both military readiness and the wider economy.

“In the event of sequestration, we will do everything we can to be able to continue to perform our core mission,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta wrote in a memo to employees this week. “But … the rigid nature of the cuts forced upon this department, and their scale, will result in a serious erosion of readiness across the force.”

For the economy, the Pentagon is both a major employer and a major buyer of goods and services. Forecasters say the defense portion of the sequester would put a noticeable dent in overall spending – felt most in states such as Virginia that have lots of civilian defense workers or weapons contractors.

It’s not yet clear whether the sequester will go into effect as scheduled on March 1, or how long after that it might take for the politically divided Congress to agree on some different budget plan.

The sequester plan, which stems from a 2011 Budget Control Act, is designed to help bring down federal deficits through across-the-board spending cuts,  if Congress can’t agree on a better plan.  

Defense cuts would account, under the law, for half the total. That amounts to about $45 billion in the current fiscal year.

Furloughs – asking most of some 800,000 civilian employees to work four days for every five they do currently – would start in April after a required notification clock ticks down.

That would be a big pay cut to those families – 20 percent. But the resulting savings of about $5 billion would account for just a fraction of the overall defense cuts, for the fiscal year ending in September. And that amount of money would put only a small dent in US consumer activity, which makes up about two-thirds of a $15.8 trillion economy.

The sequester would affect military readiness, which is one reason some budget analysts expect that Congress wouldn't allow it to stay in effect for very long.

For the economy, the $45 billion in defense cuts would be an amount equal to about 0.3 percent of one year’s gross domestic product.  That doesn’t mean the cuts would reduce this year’s GDP by that exact amount. But forecasters say the overall sequester cuts, defense and nondefense, could slow the pace of economic growth by half a percentage point or so.

In an economy that may be growing at only a 2 percent annual rate, that’s a significant hit.

Economists generally don’t see it causing a recession. But manufacturers warn of significant job losses, centered heavily in the defense sector.

Overall, this would slow US job growth in the private sector – perhaps costing 1 million jobs. The Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington think tank, has estimated that the economy might add 3 million jobs over the next two years with the sequester in place, versus 4 million without it.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Pentagon braces for furloughs in sequester: How big a hit to economy?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/DC-Decoder/2013/0221/Pentagon-braces-for-furloughs-in-sequester-How-big-a-hit-to-economy
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe