Fifty years after 'war on poverty': Who's poor now? (+video)

Fifty years after the advent of the “war on poverty,” the lives of low-income Americans have improved on many fronts even as the US faces persistent challenges, led by the prevalence of single-parent households. Here are four yardsticks to measure American poverty, then and now.

2. Poverty and the single mom

Melanie Stetson Freeman/The Christian Science Monitor
Jaleeia Broddus and her daughter, Jamilyah, sign up to get food and services at the People's Resource Center, on August 20, 2013 in Wheaton, Illinois. Broddus is a single mom who works part time at Dunkin Donuts and goes to college. It's her first visit to this food pantry.

The rise of safety-net programs, including those championed by Johnson, has helped to reduce both overall poverty and the likelihood that a single-parent household will be in poverty. Another mitigating factor is rising job opportunities for women.

Yet the number of Americans who live in single-parent households has soared since 1964 – and those families are still more likely to be poor than two-parent households are.

The numbers are stunning in their apparent contradiction: For anyone living in a household headed by a single mother, the odds of living in poverty have fallen from 50 percent in 1964 to 34 percent today. Yet the other side of the coin is that single-mom households now account for a greater share of all poor Americans today (34 percent) than they did in 1964 (21 percent).

Behind this seeming anomaly is the fact that there are simply more single-parent households today. The Census surveys find that 25 percent of Americans now live in “families with a female householder, no husband present.” That’s up from 8.5 percent in 1965. (This story compares 2012 figures with 1964 data when possible, and substitutes the closest possible years otherwise.)

Back then, concern about the decline of traditional family structure stirred discussion as a challenge confronting poor and urban African-Americans. Today, researchers are concerned about declining marriage rates for a broad swath of working-class Americans.

The rise of single-parent households heightens the risk of poverty for both parents and children. And, although there's been a rise in the number of children being raised by two unmarried adults, the overarching family trend since 1964 is a rise of single-parent households.
 
"Research has consistently shown that both divorce and nonmarital childbearing increase child poverty," University of Virginia demographer Brad Wilcox wrote in a 2010 report.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.