How GOP leaders, with President Obama, trounced trade critics

When conservative critics threatened to scuttle the trade deal, GOP leaders stripped them of leadership roles or called the White House for help with Democrats. It was a professional job, done in a bipartisan fashion. This time, the center held. 

|
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP
House Speaker John Boehner (R) of Ohio speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on Thursday. The Republican-led Congress completed President Obama's trade package Thursday, overwhelmingly passing a worker training program just weeks after it was stymied.

Drudge calls it Obamatrade. The Huffington Post claims that the Democrats “caved” on trade.

Ted Cruz voted no, at the last second, blaming the Export Import bank. Seems like everything under the sun can be blamed on Ex-Im bank. Maybe Mr. Cruz will link the bank to climate change next.

Brietbart claims that the trade pact includes secret language on immigration. Elizabeth Warren claims that it includes secret language to repeal Dodd-Frank. 

Bernie Sanders hates it. So does Jim DeMint.

Members of the House Freedom Caucus who voted against a procedural motion on trade now have the freedom that comes from not being a subcommittee chairman or part of the whip team. They will have a lot more time on their hands to read Breitbart and Drudge.

Nancy Pelosi and her colleague, Rosa DeLauro, thought they had a clever plan to kill TPA. Instead they just embarrassed themselves and their president.

When it comes to trade, the center held. Again.

Trade agreements are essential for American job creation.

Big business and small business only can grow when we grow markets overseas, because that is where the bulk of the potential customers are. And American businesses compete more efficiently and better when we have common rules of the road with our trading partners.

Despite the clamor from the Left and the Right, this point got across with the bulk of Congress.

This didn’t happen without some turmoil.

It never does.

Ted Cruz and Mike Lee surprised their leadership in dramatic fashion yesterday with their no votes on cloture, but Mitch McConnell quietly phoned the president who produced the necessary yes votes to get to 60.

It was a professional job, done in a bipartisan fashion.

On the House side, conservatives rebelled on a rule vote, but John Boehner and his leadership team were able to call on pro-trade Democrats to help them over the top.

It, too, was a professional operation, done in a bipartisan fashion.

It’s unclear if Mitch McConnell will do anything to punish either Cruz or Lee, although Mr. Lee’s votes against his state are making a primary challenge all the more likely.

Utah is a sophisticated and very business-savvy place. Lee’s tenure in the Senate doesn’t reflect that sophistication. He is an ideologue in a place that values business acumen. He should mind his p’s and q’s.

Speaker Boehner moved swiftly to show his displeasure with the rebels, stripping them of their committee chairmanships and their leadership positions.

There was some grumbling about a coup, but that’s all nonsense. Jim Jordan and his ilk don’t have the votes, don’t have a candidate and don’t have a clue about how to replace John Boehner. He will leave when he is good and ready and not a moment before.

The center held on trade. It will likely hold on Ex-Im bank (despite irrational opposition mounted by the right), highway funding (whenever a pay-for can be found) and perhaps on tax extenders.

Getting trade done wasn’t a sure thing. It is a major accomplishment and it came from the center, not the wings.

John Feehery publishes his Feehery Theory blog at http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How GOP leaders, with President Obama, trounced trade critics
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2015/0625/How-GOP-leaders-with-President-Obama-trounced-trade-critics
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe