Tony Parker's last-second heroics lift Spurs over Heat

The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Miami Heat last night, 92-88 to take the first game in their best-of-seven 2013 NBA Finals. Can the Heat recover?

|
Steve Mitchell/AP
Miami Heat center Joel Anthony (50) defends against San Antonio Spurs point guard Tony Parker (9) during Game 1 of basketball's NBA Finals, Thursday night in Miami.

Tony Parker’s acrobatic shot under the outstretched arms of LeBron James with 5.2 seconds remaining powered the visiting San Antonio Spurs to a 92-88 victory over the Miami Heat in game one of the 2013 NBA Finals Thursday night at Miami’s American Airlines Arena.

Parker’s high-arcing shot off the glass was checked by officials to make sure that he beat the 24-second shot clock, which expired just after the ball left Parker’s hands. San Antonio, which had trailed for most of the game, got 10 points from Parker in the fourth quarter – only six fewer than the entire Heat team scored in the same period. Parker led all scorers with 21 points (along with 6 assists), followed closely behind by teammate Tim Duncan, who had 20 points and 14 rebounds.

San Antonio played a veteran game in many ways, committing only four turnovers – half of Miami’s very respectable eight – and a total of 12 personal fouls. The Spurs also hit 83 percent of their free throws, as opposed to the Heat’s 70 percent. And in addition to Parker and Duncan, the Spurs got double-digit scoring from Manu Ginobili (13 points) and Danny Green, who hit four 3-pointers for 12 points – though San Antonio as a team was a mediocre 7-23 from behind the arc.

Miami got strong performances from LeBron James, who had his third career triple-double in NBA Finals play, with 18 points, 18 rebounds, and 10 assists, while Dwyane Wade, who was 7-15 from the floor to finish with 17 points. Chris Bosh and Ray Allen each posted 13 points for the Heat – with Allen hitting three 3-pointers, and Bosh adding 5 rebounds.

But this game was one of shifting momentum in the latter minutes. With the Heat leading the entire way (and 52-49 at the half), the Spurs went ahead with 7:39 left in the fourth with a jump shot by Kawhi Leonard, which made the score 79-78 with 7 minutes remaining. And largely due to Parker’s attack of the basket in the fourth period, San Antonio won the points in the paint, 40-34. Additionally, Miami’s eight turnovers led to 15 points, whereas San Antonio’s four miscues only resulted in 8 points.

The biggest problem Miami faced all evening – and one they will need to address as the series progresses – is how to guard Parker. He can beat teams on the perimeter with both shots and assists, and has fluid motion in the lane off the pick-and-roll, which confounded guards Mario Chalmers and Norris Cole all of Game One.

And Miami has to find answers going inside themselves against the Spurs’ Duncan, Boris Diaw, and Danny Green, who combined for 21 rebounds and 5 blocked Heat shots last night. Lastly, the Spurs do not wilt in other teams’ houses. They are 7-1 on the road, and 13-2 overall in the playoffs. And in connection with that statistic, the team that wins the first game of an NBA Finals series wins just over 71 percent of the time. The 2-3-2 game format, which, as James remarked after last night’s game “It is what it is,” is another potential pitfall for Miami.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tony Parker's last-second heroics lift Spurs over Heat
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Sports/2013/0607/Tony-Parker-s-last-second-heroics-lift-Spurs-over-Heat
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe