Upgrading immigration: White House looks to digitize visa experience

A new report suggests specific ways to bring the US immigration process into the 21st century.

|
Eric Gay/AP Photo/File
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine agent's patch is seen as he patrols patrol near the Texas-Mexico border , Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2015, in Rio Grande City, Texas. A new White House report, released July 15, 2015, is exploring ways to improve and upgrade the US immigration and visa application process.

In the United States, the word “immigration” tends to divide, not unite. But if there’s one thing Americans – regardless of color, creed, or politics – may be able to agree on, it’s that the visa application process needs an upgrade.

Enter the new White House report, released this month, that looks at how to organize and digitize the US immigration system.

Titled “Modernizing and Streamlining our Legal Immigration System for the 21st Century,” the report is a result of a month-long assessment of the Departments of State and Homeland Security and outlines specific steps to bring the nation’s antiquated and onerous visa application system into the digital age. Among its recommendations: Cut the amount of paperwork involved, improve communication between government agencies, and make the process as clear and simple as possible.

To put the report together, the White House enlisted the US Digital Service, formed in 2014 in response to the healthcare.gov fiasco and led by former Google engineer Mikey Dickerson.

“Currently, the process to apply for a visa is complex, paper-based, and confusing to the user. Many immigration documents pass through various computer systems and change hands no fewer than six times,” Mr. Dickerson wrote in a blog post he co-authored with Domestic Policy Council director Cecilia Muñoz.

“Our goal is to modernize this process and deliver a positive experience to our users,” they added.

While much of the current immigration debate centers on legislation surrounding border security and undocumented immigrants, there is also an urgent need to update the technical process: The State Department issued nearly a quarter of a million immigrant visas in 2014, and as of November had more than 4.4 million visa applicants on its waiting list.

Potential reforms being discussed in Congress could benefit from the use of existing information and technologies, experts say.

“Think of what the TurboTax concept has done for the IRS,” Pat Schambach, former vice president and general manager of Homeland Security and Law Enforcement at Virginia-based IT firm CSC, said at a company Town Hall. “We can use technology to apply very similarly to the immigration process and really streamline the process.”

The report’s recommendations are straightforward. It proposes, for instance, the consolidation of payment methods, which are currently done separately for various steps in the application process.

“Paying multiple fees should be as simple as buying multiple items in an online shopping cart,” according to the report. “Separating the fees for different processes should happen entirely on the back-end.”

The report also recommends allowing forms such as family-sponsored immigrant petitions to be filed electronically, both to eliminate the need for paper and to make it easier for different departments to have access to the paperwork. It also suggests creating an online dashboard where applicants can view their case status, and redesigning the system based on applicants’ identities, not the forms they fill out.

“For example, a digital process that equates to filling out two paper forms should not require an applicant to enter their name and biographical information twice,” according to the report.

Some of the recommendations are already being tested in consular offices in Montreal, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, and Sydney, and a more expansive rollout is planned for 2016.

Of course, the report’s remedies are neither perfect nor all-encompassing.

“These fixes ... are just a bandaid on the gaping wound that is our convoluted and at times unjust immigration system,” wrote Issie Lapowsky, who first reported the story for Wired.

Still, she noted, “they could at least serve to ensure that no one has trouble securing a visa simply because the application is too complex. And that, at least, is a good place to start.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Upgrading immigration: White House looks to digitize visa experience
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0722/Upgrading-immigration-White-House-looks-to-digitize-visa-experience
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe