Global warming has made California's drought worse, say scientists

Scientists say global warming has likely contributed to California's megadrought. According to the researchers, increasing heat is driving moisture from the ground. 

|
Rich Pedroncelli/AP/File
Gino Celli, who relies on senior water rights to water his crops, inspects a wheat field nearing harvest on his farm near Stockton, Calif., May 18, 2015.

Climate change has worsened California’s historic drought, according to a study released Thursday. 

The study's authors say the drought is a mostly natural event, but they blamed human-induced global warming for increasing its intensity by up to 20 percent.

The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, found that climate change due to human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases is the cause of between 8 to 27 percent of the drought conditions between 2012 and 2014 and between 5 to 18 percent in 2014.

"A lot of people think that the amount of rain that falls out the sky is the only thing that matters," said lead author A. Park Williams, a bioclimatologist at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, in a statement. "But warming changes the baseline amount of water that's available to us, because it sends water back into the sky."

To figure out how much global warming contributed to California’s drought, the researchers analyzed month-by-month climate data from 1901 to 2014 to look for changes in precipitation, wind, temperature, and humidity. The study found that average temperatures have creept up – about 2.5 degrees Fahrenheit over the 114-year period, right in step with growing fossil-fuel emissions.

The researchers say for California, which has been unusually hot over the last several years when rainfall decreased in 2012, the air sucked already scant moisture from soil, trees, and crops harder than ever.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasts a giant El Niño, raising the prospect of long and heavy rains that could relieve California’s four-year dry spell. “When this happens, the danger is that it will lull people into thinking that everything is now OK, back to normal,” said Williams. “But as time goes on, precipitation will be less able to make up for the intensified warmth. People will have to adapt to a new normal.”

While scientists have made such assertions before, this is first study to estimate how much worse. A paper by scientists from Lamont-Doherty and Cornell University, published in February, warned that climate change will push much of the central and western United States into the driest period for at least 1,000 years. A March study by Stanford University said that California droughts have been intensified by higher temperatures, and gives similar warnings for the future.

"Of course low precipitation is a prerequisite for drought, but less rain and snowfall alone don't ensure a drought will happen. It really matters if the lack of precipitation happens during a warm or cool year,” climatologist Noah Diffenbaugh who led the Stanford research said. "We've seen the effects of record heat on snow and soil moisture this year in California, and we know from this new research that climate change is increasing the probability of those warm and dry conditions occurring together."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Global warming has made California's drought worse, say scientists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0820/Global-warming-has-made-California-s-drought-worse-say-scientists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe