Icebreaker envy? Why Obama wants more icebreakers in the Arctic

Russia has 40 icebreakers. The US has 2. President Obama proposed a plan to beef up the US Coast Guard’s presence in the Arctic, as rapidly melting ice spurs economic development in the region. 

|
US Coast Guard/Reuters/File
United States Coast Guard Heavy Icebreaker Polar Star (WAGB 10) is shown in Antarctica in this undated photo. President Barack Obama is proposing a faster timetable for buying a new heavy icebreaker for the Arctic, where quickly melting sea ice has spurred more maritime traffic, and the United States has fallen far behind Russian infrastructure.

President Obama wants new heavy icebreakers in the Arctic sooner rather than later.

On Tuesday – the second day of his historic three-day trip to Alaska to highlight the causes and effects of climate change – the president propsed speeding up the timetable for buying and building new ships that can operate year-round in the nation’s polar territories, The New York Times reports.

The plan, which included accelerating the construction of a new Coast Guard icebreaker by two years, would strengthen US presence in the Arctic, where a changing climate is creating new economic opportunities for a slew of countries, especially those with territorial claims in the region: Canada, Norway, Denmark, Russia, and the United States.

"Many forecast Arctic summers will be free of ice in a matter of decades, potentially opening the region up to hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, including energy production, shipping, and fishing," the Council of Foreign Relations reported last year. "The thaw will also pose new security demands as greater human activity induces states to increase their military and constabulary presence."

With only two heavy icebreakers available for everything from rescue missions to defending US territory to protecting the environment, the Coast Guard is not equipped for the new realities of Arctic activity, according to a July Congressional Research Service report on the need for icebreaker modernization.

The Coast Guard's only active heavy polar icebreaker, Polar Star, is almost 10 years over its intended 30-year service lifespan; its sister ship, Polar Sea, went inactive in 2011. A third Coast Guard ship, Healy, began service in 2000, but it is a "medium polar icebreaker" primarily suited to supporting scientific research, the report found.

"Russia, on the other hand, has 40 icebreakers and another 11 planned or under construction," the White House said. President Vladimir Putin has also stepped up his country’s military deployments and permanent infrastructure in the region over the last few years, even going so far as to restore abandoned Soviet-era bases and claim ownership of the North Pole. Early last month, Russia submitted its latest claims over a vast swath of the Arctic Ocean to the United Nations, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

Nor is Russia the only nation jostling for position in the Arctic. Canada, Finland, and Sweden all have bigger icebreaker fleets than the US, NPR reports, while China, South Korea, and Singapore are exploring the possibility of shipping commercial cargo to European markets via Arctic waters, according to the New York Times.

“The United States really isn’t even in this game,” Adm. Paul F. Zukunft, the Coast Guard’s commandant, said in a Washington conference this year.

But the cost, not to mention the bureaucratic processes, involved in procuring even one new icebreaker could be prohibitive. The Alaska Dispatch News reports:

The Coast Guard says it could take about $1 billion and a decade to secure another heavy icebreaker, mostly because a long checklist of federal agencies would have a stake in it, and would provide input and ensure their needs are satisfied … [Former NASA administrator Sean O’Keefe, now a senior advisor for the Center for Strategic International Studies, argues that] securing a new icebreaker meets all the objectives for the Obama administration’s national security initiatives and Arctic policy, but federal agencies are bottlenecked by traditional procurement.

Mr. Obama’s proposal includes purchasing a new heavy icebreaker by 2020 instead of the original deadline of 2022, planning construction for more icebreakers, and revising outdated maps for regions with newly open waters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Icebreaker envy? Why Obama wants more icebreakers in the Arctic
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/USA-Update/2015/0901/Icebreaker-envy-Why-Obama-wants-more-icebreakers-in-the-Arctic
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe