Skip to footer

'Honor killings' in Canada: 5 responses to the Shafia verdict

Here are five opinions and editorials published in Canadian news outlets after the guilty verdict, which carried a sentence of life in prison with no parole for 25 years.

2. No religious community has monopoly on violence against women

  • By Whitney Eulich Staff Writer

Editorial, The Toronto Star

 “The case so shocked Canada’s Muslim community that prominent leaders and scholars felt moved to decry the fiction that Islam condones such mistreatment of women. 'Murder is … haram (prohibited) to the severest degree,' warned Imam Sikander Ziad Hashmi of the Islamic Society of Kingston, 'and cannot be justified in any way.' That message was firmly reinforced by imams in mosques across the nation.
 
To be sure, no religious or social community has a monopoly on violence against women. The hundreds of shelters across Canada for abused women and children are proof enough that this blight cuts across religious and cultural borders.
 
But the Shafia case struck a nerve with Muslims because Mohammad Shafia sought to justify murder on the grounds that the women 'betrayed us,' 'betrayed Islam,' and betrayed 'our (family) honour.' As the trial showed, it was Shafia, his wife and son who betrayed both their faith and their family by terrorizing those close to them, stooping to violence and then lying under oath.”

2 of 5
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.