Mexico elections: How 5 local issues could impact the next president

Nearly 80 million Mexicans are eligible to vote on Sunday to elect a new president. Most polls put Enrique Peña Nieto of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) at the front. His main rivals are Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador of the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) and Josefina Vazquez Mota of the ruling National Action Party (PAN).

Mexicans will also elect 128 senators, 500 deputies, six governors, and the mayor of Mexico City, one of the most important posts in the nation. Some of these are key races that will have implications for the new president's mandate, the parties' evolving appeal and geographic reach, and the ability for Mexico to pass much needed reforms.

A bellwether state

Esteban Felix/AP
A bus in Mexico City carries political advertisements for PRI candidate Enrique Pena Nieto; polls predict he will win the July 1 election for Mexico's presidency.

The PRI ruled as a one-party system in Mexico for most of the 20th century. When it lost to the PAN in 2000, after 71 years, Mexico hailed the change in power. Now the PRI is poised to take back the presidency: a huge victory for the party. But just as significant would be winning the gubernatorial race in Jalisco state, which is home to Mexico's second biggest city, Guadalajara. It was here in the early 1990s the opposition started showing signs of edging out the PRI's far-reaching foothold in Mexico.

The PRI slowly lost its grip on Mexican society throughout the 1980s and ‘90s but one of the defining moments was the peso devaluation in 1994 and resulting financial crisis. In the midst of this Jalisco, in west-central Mexico, headed to the polls to vote in a governor, and the opposition PAN won. “This election began a wave of PAN victories [at the state level] until finally the PRI was voted out [of the presidency] in 2000,” says Roy Campos, director of the polling firm Mitofsky in Mexico City. Winning Jalisco back would solidify the perception of the PRI's “comeback,” not just at the top but across all levels of government and geographic regions.

A poll in late May by the daily El Universal put the PRI coalition candidate, Jorge Aristóteles Sandoval, in first place.

1 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.