Myanmar cease-fire: Who are the Karen rebels?

2. How did the Karen rebel groups get started?

The Karen National Union, the official name of the Karen rebel army, has been fighting Myanmar's (Burma's) military and government since gaining independence from the British 60 years ago.  But their rift largely started before that, during WWII when the Karen sided with the British, and the ethnic Burmans with the Japanese.  

Japan invaded Myanmar in 1941, and fighting between Japan and the Allied forces continued through 1945, wrecking havoc on local land and populations. During negotiations for Independence from Britain, the Karen lobbied for autonomy from Burma, and for their own land.  The Karen National Union (KNU) was created in 1947, and Burmese independence was gained from Britain in 1948, though the Karen requests went unacknowledged.

As Burma, and later Myanmar, the country has had a consistent track record of repressing ethnic minorities, including the Karen.  

Shortly after independence from Britain, attempts at negotiations between ethnic groups who called for an end to such treatment and the government were met by military oppression.  The Karen rebel group and other ethnic resistance armies began sprouting up in response. 

KNU was one of the largest, claiming at one point to have an army of 14,000 fighters, and controlled large swaths of territory along the eastern border, according to the BBC.  In more recent years, as Karen rebel groups have splintered, the number of their fighters has decreased and the group has lost control of strategic land.

The KNU’s political agenda is no longer relevant to all Karen communities, according to the Transnational Institute.

2 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.