Myanmar cease-fire: Who are the Karen rebels?

4. What is the nature of the cease-fire agreement?

Khin Maung Win/AP
Clad in traditional costumes, a delegation of Myanmar's Karen National Union led by leader Gen. Saw Mutu Sai Po, second from right in foreground, walks outside a hotel before their signing ceremony with Myanmar's government in Pa-an, Myanmar, Thursday.

The agreement is part of a larger effort by government leaders to end years of fighting against a handful of ethnic groups controlling different regions of the country, reports The Wall Street Journal.  Many of these groups are seeking greater autonomy.

The KNU will select a representative to continue talks with Myanmar’s government within 45 days of this initial agreement, reports Agence France-Presse, and according to Myanmar state radio and television the government plans to release some 650 prisoners.  Activists worry, however, that there will be more common criminals released than political detainees. 

Some experts speculate the cease-fire was brought about, in part, because of the government's big plans for the Dawei Development Project, a $50 billion industrial scheme to relocate refineries and other heavy industry from Thailand. The vast project, if completed, will run through Karen lands. Though the cease-fire is largely viewed as a positive step for the historically repressive regime, the Myanmar government does continue fighting with other ethnic groups including the Kachin in the north of the country.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.