India, Pakistan trade gunfire in Kashmir. What happened to the relationship reset?

Indian and Pakistani soldiers traded fire over the disputed Kashmir border, killing nine and causing thousands to flee. The altercation comes just months after outreach from Indian Prime Minister Modi sparked hopes of a detente.

|
Channi Anand/AP
Relatives of Rajesh Kumar, who was killed in mortar shell firing allegedly from the Pakistan's side, weep inside their residential house at Masha da kothe village, in Arnia Sector near the India-Pakistan international border, about 30 miles from Jammu, India, Monday, Oct. 6, 2014. Tens of thousands of villagers were fleeing their homes in Kashmir on Monday, as Indian and Pakistani troops bombarded each another with gunfire and mortar shells over the border separating Pakistan from India's portion of the disputed region. At least nine civilians were killed.

At least nine civilians were killed in Kashmir on Monday as Indian and Pakistani troops traded fire in the disputed region, in the latest setback to what had looked like renewed cooperation between the two nuclear-armed rivals just months ago.

Indian officials say five civilians were killed on their side of the border. The Pakistan Army confirmed four civilian deaths. Tens of thousands of villagers have fled their homes to escape the cross-border shelling by Indian and Pakistani troops, the Associated Press reports. 

Relations appeared to be warming when Narendra Modi, India’s new prime minister, invited Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to his inauguration in May. The Pakistani premier’s attendance at the ceremony, the first in the history of the two countries, raised hopes of a thaw in tensions.

But those hopes diminished in August when India cancelled talks with Pakistan after accusing it of interfering with its internal affairs, the BBC reports.

Indian officials called off the meeting when they learned that the Pakistani envoy had met with Kashmiri separatist leaders. The two countries’ foreign secretaries were to meet in Islamabad to discuss ways of renewing a formal dialogue.

Monday’s gunfire and mortar shelling was one of the worst violations of a 2003 cease-fire between India and Pakistan, the AP reports. Commanders of both countries’ border forces had met prior to the outburst in an attempt to calm tensions. The incident follows a similar outburst of cross-border violence that killed at least six people in August.

Each side accused the other of firing first on Monday, the Wall Street Journal reports.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress, the two largest political parties in India, both put the blame squarely on Pakistan

"Whatever Pakistan is doing is certainly a serious matter. And we want to tell Pakistan that indulging in such activities is not good for that country," BJP leader Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi told the Times of India.

The AP reports that Indian officials have long accused Pakistan of waging violence to cover for Pakistani militants sneaking into India. But Pakistan denies what Prime Minster Modi has dubbed a “proxy war.”

The South Asian rivals both control a portion of Kashmir and claim it in its entirety. The region has been a flashpoint for more than 60 years, sparking two of the countries' three wars with one another, and regular skirmishes.

Writing for Foreign Policy in September, Allison Berland and Michael Kugelman said the “new leaderships in India and Pakistan offer reasons for cautious optimism toward reviving peace efforts.” But they acknowledged that such efforts could easily evaporate:

Historically, bilateral relations have resembled a boomerang: Efforts toward reconciliation have proceeded in fits and starts, with steps forward and hopes raised - followed by steps back and hopes dashed. Just when progress is being made, disaster strikes …  In the short term, it will be difficult for the two countries to extricate themselves from this fits-and-starts pattern, and to find new sustained patterns of relating to one another.

Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh warned on Monday that Pakistan should “understand the reality that the times have changed in India,” the Times reports. The new government has vowed to crack down on national security issues.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to India, Pakistan trade gunfire in Kashmir. What happened to the relationship reset?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2014/1006/India-Pakistan-trade-gunfire-in-Kashmir.-What-happened-to-the-relationship-reset
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe