Who's reading the new edition of Mein Kampf? Not who Germans feared.

A critical edition of Hitler's signature tome was published last year just as anti-refugee sentiment was rising in Germany. But concern that neo-Nazis were driving the book's best-seller status were unfounded.

|
Sara Miller Llana/The Christian Science Monitor
Cornelia Kirchner-Feyerabend, a high school history teacher in Nuremberg who supports taking an honest look at Germany's past, leafs through an original copy of Mein Kampf in February 2016.

When the copyright expired on Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf at the end of 2015 – opening shelf space for a new critical edition – some Germans worried it would become a hit at precisely the worst time. Some 1 million refugees had entered Germany, stirring anti-immigrant sentiment that has buoyed the once-taboo far-right.

This week, the publisher of “Hitler, Mein Kampf: A Critical Edition” seemed to confirm moderates' worst fears, announcing that the two-volume annotated edition was a non-fiction best-seller in Germany last year, just as Hitler’s original was between the two world wars.

But the demand is being driven not by neo-Nazis, the publisher says – rather, by teachers, libraries, history buffs, and those yearning to understanding the parallels between the populism of now and then.

Sven Felix Kellerhoff, a German author and journalist, wrote a book called “Mein Kampf," in 2015, tracing the history of a tome whose title is well-known but whose content is not. He says his book and the new critical edition help destroy the enigma surrounding a treatise that is badly written and poorly conceptualized but laid the groundwork for World War II. The original, which outlines Hitler’s hatred of Jews and ultimately led to the Holocaust, was banned at the end of that devastating conflict. But prohibition in more recent times has tended to shroud it in mystery, he says.

“Mein Kampf was dangerous only as a myth, as a rumor, as a so-called ‘banned book.’ Now, with the very good scientific edition and maybe a little bit with my own book, this myth is destroyed,” Mr. Kellerhoff says.

The Munich-based Institute for Contemporary History (IfZ), which published the 1,948-page work, initially planned to print 4,000 copies, and at the time acknowledged the sensitivity around its publication for the first time since 1945. Tuesday it announced it has since sold 85,000 copies and is releasing its sixth edition at the end of January.

"It turned out that the fear the publication would promote Hitler's ideology or even make it socially acceptable and give neo-Nazis a new propaganda platform was totally unfounded," IfZ director Andreas Wirsching said in a statement. “On the contrary, the discussion about Hitler's world view and how to deal with his propaganda offered the opportunity to look at the disastrous roots and consequences at a time when authoritarian political ideas and right-wing slogans are again gaining followers.”

That sentiment speaks to an entire cultural rethink of remnants of the Reich. While reporting a Christian Science Monitor magazine story last year in Nuremberg, which was contemplating how to preserve the Nazi Rally Grounds, I met Cornelia Kirchner-Feyerabend, a high school history teacher. That day, she was thumbing through an antique edition of an original “Mein Kampf” that one of her students brought in. It was his great-uncle’s, who received it as a wedding gift from his city's mayor.

She said her own high school teacher would not have dared bring the book into his classroom. At that time, Hitler’s text was treated as something to be locked in the “poison cabinet.” She couldn’t wait to get her hands on the new critical edition, which had sold out quickly.

The book's debut last year happened to fall just after mass sexual assaults during Cologne’s New Year’s Eve celebration, which was blamed mainly on men of North African and Middle Eastern descent and inflamed anti-refugee sentiment.

At a bookstore at the city’s train station, one customer told me his uncle had asked him to buy him a copy. He refused on the grounds that he wanted nothing to do with Hitler, “that psychopath.”

Another customer admitted he’d be self-conscious about flipping through pages in public because he wouldn’t want anyone to think it was out of contempt for the refugees who have come to Germany. But he planned to buy “Hitler, Mein Kampf: A Critical Edition" because he saw an opportunity to glean new insights. “You get a chance to learn more about that history, to understand it’s not the truth,” he said.

Mr. Kellerhoff says when he takes his own book to German schools, he always gets the same response: a recognition by the students that Mein Kampf offers only simplistic answers to difficult problems.

”It’s like the refugees. Of course you can say all refugees should get out of Europe," he says. "But that is not possible. It’s a simple answer. … This thinking leads to catastrophe.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Who's reading the new edition of Mein Kampf? Not who Germans feared.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2017/0104/Who-s-reading-the-new-edition-of-Mein-Kampf-Not-who-Germans-feared
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe