Worried about Scotland vote, UK unveils big threat

Scotland's pro-independence block has argued it would keep the pound sterling as its currency if the referendum is passed. But, the UK's top political parties put the kibosh on that possibility today.

|
Scott Heppell/AP
A trio of Scottish Saltire flags are displayed at the Scottish border at Berwick Upon Tweed, Thursday, Feb. 13, 2014. Scotland has been warned. If it votes to leave the United Kingdom later this year, then it walks away from the pound. That's the hard-line message presented Thursday by UK Treasury chief George Osborne, who ruled out a currency union in a speech in the Scottish capital of Edinburgh.

The “no” campaign on the question of Scottish independence just rolled out its big guns. The three top political parties in the United Kingdom came out Thursday to jointly promise that no matter who forms the next government, none of them would agree to join a currency union with an independent Scotland. The timing of this explicit threat of economic chaos – seven months ahead of the referendum – suggests the “no” campaign was growing nervous about recent warming of the Scottish electorate toward independence, says our correspondent in Glasgow.

“This is the ‘no’ campaign’s big weapon, and they hit it now, they hit early. So they had been rattled. You have to imagine if they did what they are doing now a month before polling, they would have almost wiped the ‘yes’ campaign out. There’s still potentially time for the ‘yes’ campaign to change it,” our correspondent says. But this pocketbook uncertainty – with voters saying the economy is their No. 1 concern – will be the “yes” campaign’s biggest challenge ahead.

Scotland’s “yes” campaign has been arguing that an independent Scotland would keep the pound sterling as its currency. The plan would be to negotiate a formal monetary union with the remaining UK where the Bank of England would become accountable to both countries.

The UK political leadership said Thursday it would not negotiate any such deal, pointing to a new UK Treasury report that draws negative parallels between the proposed Sterling Area and the eurozone. Scottish voters will well remember, our correspondent says, that during the eurocrisis, governments with a shared currency but diverging political authority lost the needed flexibility to individually adjust monetary policy. “[T]he experience of the global financial crisis suggests that countries with more flexible macroeconomic policy regimes, in particular with more direct control over their monetary policy, can be better equipped through periods of very severe economic stress,” the report reads.

Scotland could, of course, simply continue to use the currency without a negotiated union. And some commentators have mentioned examples... For the rest of the story, continue reading at our new business publication Monitor Global Outlook.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Worried about Scotland vote, UK unveils big threat
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2014/0213/Worried-about-Scotland-vote-UK-unveils-big-threat
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe