Why Denmark might seize migrants' valuables

Denmark has achieved cross-party support for a plan to take valuables from incoming migrants. The plan is light on details, but could take effect next month.

|
Reuters/Marie Hald/Scanpix Denmark
Former Danish prime minister Helle Thorning Schmidt (L) and Johanne Schmidt Nielsen of the opposition party "Enhedslisten" attend a parliament debate on a raft of proposals on changing immigration laws, at the parliament building at Christiansborg in Copenhagen January 13, 2016. A new policy of confiscating valuables from incoming migrants has gained cross-part support in Denmark.

Denmark’s strict stance toward migrants is about to get stricter.

The Scandinavian country's minority government has secured support for a new immigration policy that calls for confiscating migrants’ valuables, amid other immigration reform proposals being debated in parliament Wednesday.

The governing Liberal Party, which drew up the confiscation policy proposal, has been light on details as to how it would be implemented. The key details known so far are that valuables would be appraised during the identity check that takes place at the start of the asylum-seeking process, and that the policy would affect migrants with items worth more than $1,450, according to The Wall Street Journal.

While the reform policy has garnered criticism domestically and abroad, it has the support of five different political parties in Denmark and is consistent with the government’s approach to the migrant crisis thus far.

“The government doesn't wish for Denmark to become a new major destination for refugees,” Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told the Journal.

Despite being nestled geographically between Germany, which is set to take in 800,000 refugees by the end of the year, and Sweden, which forecasts spending more than $8 billion over the next two years on refugees, Denmark’s approach to the migrant crisis has differed.

Following a swing to a center-right government in the June election season, Denmark has actively tried to discourage migrants from seeking asylum there. In September, the government took out advertisements in Arabic in Lebanon that highlighted the changes Denmark was making to its asylum program.

Some view the new reforms as an extension of those efforts to dissuade migrants from coming to Denmark.

In a December debate, the head of Red Green Alliance, the opposition party, criticized the plan, saying it signals to everyone that asylum seekers are not welcome in Denmark, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

The United Nations Refugee Agency has criticized the proposal as well, warning that it could “fuel fear, xenophobia, and similar restrictions that would reduce – rather than expand – the asylum space globally.”

In response, the Danish government has pointed to domestic policies in place limiting the amount of assets those seeking welfare are allowed to have.

“We’re simply applying the same rules we apply to Danish citizens who wish to take money from the Danish government,” Danish government spokesman Marcus Knuth told the Guardian in January.

The immigration reform policies are currently supported by the Social Democrats, the Danish People’s Party, the Liberal Alliance, the Conservative People’s Party, and the governing Liberal Party. The proposal could go into effect as early as next month.

“In Denmark, you should support yourself if you can,” Immigration Minister Inger Stojberg said in a statement.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Denmark might seize migrants' valuables
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2016/0113/Why-Denmark-might-seize-migrants-valuables
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe