Tweets could create flood maps that help save lives

Messages on social media during a recent flood in Jakarta, Indonesia, gave information about locals conditions such as water depth, enough to create useful flood maps, researchers found.

|
Darren Whiteside/Reuters/File
A student waits inside a vehicle during a traffic jam caused by water on the roads after heavy rains flooded parts of Jakarta, Indonesia, in February. Analyzing data collected from the tweets of ordinary people may help cities better deal with natural disasters in the future.

Spontaneous tweets about major floods are being turned into a mapping tool that could be used by emergency services and disaster response teams to save lives and provide aid, Dutch researchers said.

When a crisis strikes, people increasingly find out about it from social media, as individuals and groups take to the internet to spread the word.

After the Indonesian capital Jakarta was hit by floods this February, related tweets peaked at almost 900 a minute, with a significant number including information about location and water depth, according to a joint study by two Dutch organizations, Deltares and Floodtags.

The team then analyzed the thousands of tweets – and others from similar flooding a year earlier – to derive a method for creating real-time flood maps based on Twitter messages, statistics, and data on land elevation and water motion.

"This method is really fast," Deltares flood expert Dirk Eilander told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. "It can produce a map within around a minute of messages being posted."

Jakarta has some gauges that measure water levels, but there is no network that can give an overview of flooding street by street. Many tweets, on the other hand, contained detailed information about how many centimeters deep the water was at particular spots, Eilander said.

Because observations by ordinary people tend to be rough estimates, the data need to be filtered, enriched, validated, and transformed into easily interpretable maps that can be used by disaster managers.

When the researchers compared their results with photographs of the Jakarta floods at more than 100 points, they found they had modeled the floods correctly in around two thirds of them and in three quarters of districts.

"Although there is still some room for improvement, these maps are very useful information for emergency services to ... find the people who are affected or to plan for evacuation routes," Eilander told journalists at a geosciences conference in Vienna, where the research was presented April 14.

The maps could also be used to help speed up recovery work after a disaster or to identify flood-prone areas that would benefit from protection, Eilander added.

The project has yet to be put into practice to support flood response, but there are plans to disseminate the information via the Floodtags website. Floodtags is a social enterprise that uses social media to monitor floods.

Analysis is also being carried out on tweets about floods in Serbia.

Deltares, an independent research institute, said the method could be scaled easily for any place in the world with enough Twitter activity – most likely in urban areas where there tends to be a high concentration of social media users.

"Everywhere that people tweet about floods, there are observations that could be used," Eilander said.

(Reporting by Megan Rowling; editing by Alex Whiting)

This article originally appeared at Thomson Reuters Foundation, a source of news, information, and connections for action.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tweets could create flood maps that help save lives
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Making-a-difference/Change-Agent/2015/0423/Tweets-could-create-flood-maps-that-help-save-lives
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe