Egyptian prosecutors perplex judge with evidence against journalists

The case against three Al Jazeera English journalists accused of having terrorism links has elicited international outrage. Today, prosectors presented evidence publicly for the first time. 

|
Mohammed Abu Zaid/AP
Al Jazeera English bureau chief Mohamed Fahmy, left, producer Baher Mohamed, second left, and correspondent Peter Greste, center, stand inside the defendants' cage in a courtroom during their trial on terror charges, along with several other defendants, in Cairo on Wednesday.

As the evidence against the Al Jazeera English journalists accused of terrorism links piled up in front of the judge, with the defendants looking on from a cage, the courtroom seemed to morph into a theater of the bizarre. 

On day two of the trial outside a Cairo prison, Judge Mohamed Nagy looked puzzled as he was presented with "evidence" to support accusations that the men had formed a Muslim Brotherhood cell that conspired to broadcast false information about the state of Egypt.

After Mr. Nagy repeatedly struggled to open the sealed boxes, suitcases and tripod bags, an "expert" was summoned to help. At times, officials took cigarette lighters to the tricky fastenings, or stabbed boxes open with their pens.

The judge appeared to lose count of the items being presented, all of them everyday items or broadcast equipment. A silver-backed Apple computer received particular scrutiny from one member of the prosecution. As he held it up to the light, two policemen sniggered.

Al Jazeera English's Cairo bureau chief, Mohamed Fahmy, was arrested in a raid on the network's temporary office in late December, along with Australian reporter Peter Greste and freelance producer Baher Mohamed. The three are among 20 defendants in a case that has prompted an international outcry over the prosecution of journalists who say they were just doing their jobs. The decision to push ahead with the case is seen as a political one, as Egypt lashes out against Qatar, its regional rival and the owners of the Al Jazeera network.

Although Egyptian media has largely treated the defendants' guilt as a certainty, today was the first time that the evidence against them was made public.

The Qatari-backed network is perceived as being sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood, which was formally designated a terrorist organization on Dec. 25. One witness, a state security officer, told the judge that the journalists' guilt stemmed from the fact of their employment with Al Jazeera.

"As soon as they cooperated with [Al Jazeera] and these [terrorist groups]... they were guilty of belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood," Ahmed Hussein, a police official taking part in the investigation, told the judge.

Although Al Jazeera's Arabic channel is frequently accused of bias and incitement – and their coverage was often sympathetic to the Brotherhood – the detained journalists work for Al Jazeera English, a more reputable, editorially separate outlet. But over the course of his questioning, Mr. Hussein was forced to admit that he had been unaware of any difference between Al Jazeera English and its Egyptian counterpart, Al Jazeera Mubasher Misr. The latter is banned in Egypt. 

In a hearing last month, the defendants were agitated, using recesses to shout messages to journalists covering the trial. This time, they were more subdued. Peter Greste, whose face has appeared on solidarity campaign posters across the world, was silent for most of the hearing. He is not a fluent Arabic speaker and appeared unable to understand developments unfolding around him. A previous request that he be provided a translator seemed to have been denied.

Uttering a rare shout from the courtroom cage, Mohamed Fahmy implored the judge to consider his reputation.

"I've been a journalist for 12 years," he shouted. "I covered the Syrian and Egyptian revolutions. No one ever said that I was dishonorable. It's impossible that I would ever betray my country."

Another defendant, Sohaib Said, cried out that he had been tortured in custody and said that he had been unable to see his family for more than 50 days.

Officials from different parts of Egypt's opaque power structure often offer differing assessments over the future of the defendants. While security officials tend to emphasize their alleged links to the Muslim Brotherhood, many senior ministers admit in private that the case has been embarrassing for Egypt.

On Tuesday Egypt's trade and investment minister, Mounir Fakhry Abdel Nour, told the BBC that he thought the arrests were a "mistake" but criticized the journalists for working without the correct paperwork. "Even journalists have to abide by the law of the land," he said.  

The trial was adjourned to March 24.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Egyptian prosecutors perplex judge with evidence against journalists
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2014/0305/Egyptian-prosecutors-perplex-judge-with-evidence-against-journalists
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe