Afghanistan meeting ends with call for talks with Taliban

Afghanistan, Pakistan, the US and China concluded their talks aimed at ending Afghanistan's 15-year Saturday with a call for direct negotiations between the government and the Taliban by the end of February.

|
Associated Press of Pakistan/AP
In this photo released by Associated Press of Pakistan, Sartaj Aziz, center, adviser to the Pakistani prime minister on foreign affairs, speaks during the third round of a meetings at the foreign ministry in Islamabad, Pakistan, Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016. China, the United States, Afghanistan and Pakistan launched their third round of talks Saturday aimed at finding a way to get the warring Taliban to sit and talk peace with the Afghan government.

Four-nation talks aimed at ending Afghanistan's 15-year war concluded Saturday with a call for direct negotiations between the government and the Taliban by the end of February, but recent battlefield advances by the insurgents could make it hard to coax them to the table.

A one-page statement released at the end of the meeting, which was attended by representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and the United States, said a roadmap for peace had been agreed upon. However it offered no details on what incentives the government might offer the Taliban.

The statement urged the Taliban, who were not present at the meeting, to join the peace process. All four countries agreed to hold a fourth meeting in Kabul on Feb. 23.

The last direct talks between Kabul and the Taliban broke down after just one round last year following the announcement of the death of Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar.

A diplomat attending the four-nation talks, which were held in Pakistan, said one of the biggest obstacles is identifying which Taliban factions are sincere about making peace and which are "irreconcilable" -- either too radical to compromise or too tainted by past atrocities.

The diplomat also said the four nations are struggling to agree on confidence-building measures and other incentives to bring the insurgents back to the negotiating table. The diplomat asked that neither his name nor nationality be used because he was not authorized to talk to the media.

Sartaj Aziz, Pakistan's special adviser on foreign affairs, said efforts "have to be aimed at persuading (the) maximum number of Taliban groups to join the peace talks."

"This will contribute to imparting a momentum to the process offering the incentive of political mainstreaming to the insurgent groups, and gradually shrink the space for the irreconcilables."

But Imtiaz Gul, executive director of the Center for Research and Security Studies in Pakistan, said there are "practically no incentives" to offer Taliban field commanders, many of whom believe they are winning the war after a series of advances over the past year.

Afghan forces have struggled to contain the Taliban since the U.S. and NATO formally concluded their combat mission and switched to a support and training role at the end of 2014.

Pakistan, which Kabul has accused of granting Taliban leaders safe haven on its territory, is seen as key to getting the insurgents to negotiate. Pakistani officials say their influence over the Taliban is overstated.

The head of Pakistan's intelligence agency, the InterServices Intelligence or ISI, met with his Afghan counterpart on Thursday, in a sign of thawing ties between the two countries, which have long accused each other of turning a blind eye to militants operating along their porous border.

Afghanistan has accused the ISI of providing backdoor assistance to Afghanistan's Taliban. Washington has openly accused the ISI of supporting the Haqqani network, a Taliban faction that is also a U.S.-declared terrorist group. The ISI has denied the allegations.

The U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan, Richard G. Olson, met Pakistan's Army Chief of Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif on Saturday. They discussed the "overall regional security situation" with a focus on Afghanistan, according to a statement issued by Pakistan's military.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Afghanistan meeting ends with call for talks with Taliban
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2016/0206/Afghanistan-meeting-ends-with-call-for-talks-with-Taliban
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe