Modern field guide to security and privacy

Hackers steal 15 percent of money generated by Internet, study estimates

It's hard to estimate global economic losses to hackers, because many countries don't track cyber-crime and many businesses underreport it. But a new study puts the number at more than $400 billion.

Global cyber-crime likely costs nations more than $400 billion annually, with American losses counting for about one-quarter of the total, according to a new study.

Examples of the problem are easy to come by. Two banks in the Persian Gulf lost $45 million in a few hours. A British company reported losing $1.3 billion from one cyber-attack. India’s computer emergency response team reported 308,371 websites hacked from 2011 to 2013.

But the authors of the report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies acknowledge that the data they gathered was incomplete – simply because many countries don’t track cyber-crime, and companies often don’t report it.

To arrive at their estimate, the authors collected data from 51 nations that monitor the problem, then combined that with CSIS survey information of businesses and other organizations in countries that do not.

The results suggest that cyber-crime is taking a significant bite out of the cyber-economy, and that the impact varies by region.

“Studies estimate that the Internet economy annually generates between $2 trillion and $3 trillion, a share of the global economy that is expected to grow rapidly,” the report states. “If our estimates are right, cybercrime extracts between 15 percent and 20 percent of the value created by the Internet.”

Criminal damage from hackers falls into three main categories: theft of intellectual property, financial crime, and theft of confidential business. Total estimated losses ranged between $375 billion and $575 billion annually.

“Even the smallest of these figures is more than the national income of most countries and governments and companies underestimate how much risk they face from cybercrime and how quickly this risk can grow,” according to the report.

High-income countries lost perhaps as much as 0.9 percent of gross domestic product on average. For developing economies less connected to the Internet, and where intellectual property plays a smaller part in the economy, economic losses were about 0.2 percent of GDP, the study found.

“The disparities we found are explained in part by the fact that the best hackers prefer to target richer countries,” wrote James Lewis and Stewart Baker, the co-authors of the report, which was funded by McAfee, a security company.

While that disparity may just reflect better record keeping, it might also suggest actual global losses are higher than estimated. Companies often underreport damages after they get hacked.

To address the problem, the study recommends better technology and stronger defenses. For example:

  • Agreeing on and applying standards and best practices.
  • International agreement on law enforcement and state behavior that includes restraints on cyber-crime, as well as working through organizations like the World Trade Organization.
  • Governments doing a better job accounting for cyber-crime losses and companies doing a better job assessing their own risk.

“These are well within the realm of the possible if people decide to treat cybercrime seriously and take action against it,” the report states.

Unless such action is taken, the authors warn that cyber-crime can be expected to grow.

“Absent these changes ... we do not see a credible scenario in which cybercrime losses diminish,” the authors write. “The outlook for the world is increased losses and slower growth.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Hackers steal 15 percent of money generated by Internet, study estimates
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/2014/0609/Hackers-steal-15-percent-of-money-generated-by-Internet-study-estimates
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe