Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

What happened, and where it points

About these ads

TO understand better the extraordinary events of last week in Washington and the implication of those events for the future, it is helpful to notice one particular feature: That is the importance in the affair of the Congress in general, and of the Senate in particular.

Two former members of the Senate, both highly respected on Capitol Hill, Sens. John Tower of Texas and Edmund Muskie of Maine, sat on the three-man panel that passed a judgment of incompetence on the handling of the Iran-contra affair. The end result of their report was the summary removal of White House chief of staff Donald Regan and his replacement by another longtime and greatly respected former senator, Howard Baker Jr. of Tennessee.

Nominally, the panel was selected and given its assignment by President Reagan himself. And nominally it was the President who dismissed Donald Regan and invited Howard Baker to take his place. But these moves were made in response to overwhelming pressure from Capitol Hill for an investigation, a report, and recommendations for change to be presented by people enjoying the confidence of Congress.

And when the time came for picking a new person to take over the damaged White House staff and restore it to working condition, the pressure was equally overwhelming for a person who could command the confidence of the Congress and so could hope to restore a satisfactory working relationship between Congress and the White House.

If the Iran-contra affair had happened in Britain, for example, there would have been a motion of nonconfidence in the government. That motion would have carried. The prime minister would then submit his resignation to the Queen and she would invite some other person to form a new government that could obtain the support of a majority in Parliament.

In its effect that is what has happened in Washington. A panel of people trusted by the Congress investigated, reported, and issued a verdict of nonconfidence in the existing White House staff. When President Reagan invited Howard Baker to come to the rescue, he was picking a man who can command a comfortable working majority in the Congress.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.