Menu
Share
Share this story
Close X
 
Switch to Desktop Site

'JFK': Fantasy History

About these ads

RARELY does a motion picture ignite the kind of controversy that has blazed around "JFK," director Oliver Stone's interpretation of the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963.

The commotion began months before the film was even completed, when the press got hold of the script. Since the movie was released last month, the furor has raged in the media.

With the intensity and pyrotechnical imagery that characterized his earlier movies like "Platoon,Born on the Fourth of July," and "Wall Street," Mr. Stone assays to debunk the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in murdering Kennedy. The film succeeds in mapping the deficiencies, inconsistencies, and unanswered questions of the Warren Commission's report, and in reviving reasonable concerns that the full truth about the assassination remains hidden.

Stone doesn't stop there, however. He hypothesizes the existence of a massive conspiracy involving the CIA, the FBI, the American military, arms merchants, and perhaps even Lyndon Johnson to kill Kennedy. Why? Because Kennedy ostensibly was "soft on communism" and planned to withdraw from Vietnam. (Stone's earlier movies manifested a '60s political sensibility, but in this film he does everything but spell America with a "k.")

Stone has been roundly criticized from many quarters, both for the audacity of his speculation, for which little hard evidence exists, and for the loose - though cinematically dazzling - way in which he weaves together real and dramatized film footage, factoids, suppositions, and outright fabrications without disclaimers. Many other makers of "docudramas" have been more conscientious than Stone in acknowledging that their works contained fictional elements.

Next

Page:   1   |   2


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Loading...