Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

High-Stakes Stage Set For Fall Trade Talks

About these ads

C. FRED BERGSTEN has been distributing a paper entitled ``Trade Policy: Apocalypse Now?'' It's scary stuff.

The director of the Institute for International Economics (IIE), an influential Washington think tank, speculates about the damage that might be done to the world economy should four major developments go badly in the next two months or so:

1. Congress votes down the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The target date for its passage is Nov. 17.

2. The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum goes badly. This first-ever summit of Asia Pacific countries takes place in Seattle Nov. 18 and 19, with President Clinton, Japanese Prime Minister Morihiro Hosokawa, and several other leaders present.

3. Bilateral trade negotiations between the United States and Japan come to an early head, with Japan rejecting US demands for quantitative targets for certain imports and for specified reductions in its global trade surplus. Congress next passes legislation imposing such targets, with deadlines, and mandating retaliation if the targets are not met. Trade conflict between the world's two largest economies then escalates substantially.

4. The Uruguay Round of world trade negotiations fails in Geneva. The seven-year-long talks face a ``truly final deadline'' of Dec. 15. ``Its collapse,'' Mr. Bergsten states, ``would produce an immediate reversion, mostly notably in this country but elsewhere as well, toward alternative tactics - unilateral, bilateral, and regional - for pursuing trade goals. The relatively open multilateral system that has undergirded postwar prosperity and stability could be fatally subverted.''

If all four events took a bad turn, ``American leadership would end,'' Bergsten warns. ``Globalism would retreat substantially if not dissolve. The psychological impact of such events on the world economy could be traumatic.... Markets everywhere could react sharply.''


Carl Weinberg, international economist of High Frequency Economics, wants the world to continue moving toward a more liberalized trade regime and cheers on Bergsten's efforts to forward that goal. But, he says, ``Bergsten's job in the world is to be alarmist.'' He describes Bergsten as an unpaid ``ambassador without portfolio'' for the Clinton administration.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.