NRA's New Aim: To Its Soften Edges and Re-enlist Moderates
Longtime sports hunters hopeful about new image, but skeptics await policy changes, new safety effort.
Back when Wheeler Johnson was a kid, he'd skip down a path from his back door and fly fish in the Potomac River. He and a few pals rode endless laps around their neighborhood on a motor scooter. And after school he'd shoulder a double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun, hitch a ride from adults who never gave his gun a second thought, and squirrel hunt until dark.
Completing the Norman Rockwell childhood in his neighborhood, just a few miles upstream from the White House, was an outdoorsman father who wrote the sportsman's column for The Washington Post. Back then, Johnson's play, including his shooting, was utterly normal and nonthreatening.
Those days of innocence that came long before the Pearl, Miss., Paducah, Ky., or Jonesboro, Ark., shootings are a time the National Rifle Association hopes to resurrect. It has a new ad campaign, a tempered message, and new president, Charlton Heston, who once split the Red Sea on the silver screen. But delivering the children of Israel from Pharaoh may seem a modest act compared with his new task.
At its 127th annual meeting that ended June 9, the group began its new tack, appealing to its moderate core of sportsmen and skeet shooters.
The new buzzword is "mainstream." For lifetime NRA members like Mr. Johnson who are tired of the NRA's tarnished image, the goal has been a long time coming. "I hope people will stay open-minded enough to give [the NRA] a chance," says the white-collar professional who still shoots sporting clays (a cross between golf and skeet).
Gun-control proponents, meanwhile, are waiting to see how the moderate course unfolds. But they're skeptical. "We think they are far from the mainstream," says Nancy Hwa of Handgun Control Inc. in Washington.
Yet Mr. Heston's appointment signals a clear change for the 2.8 million strong group that even some members believe has been existing for its most extreme, fringe membership. In recent years a gap deepened between moderate elements, keen on protecting their right to bear sporting firearms, and other members advocating the right to own virtually any firearm.