Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

Curbing campaign spending won't help

About these ads

If the motive behind political campaign-finance reform laws is to curb the purchasing of political influence ("A deal-cutting Congress goes on spending spree" and "Europe, like US, seeks curbs on party funding," Oct. 12), then why not go to the source and cut the power wielded by politicians? The alternatives will not work and are unfair.

More-stringent finance restrictions would move campaign funding behind closed doors. Limits on campaign spending favor incumbents who would offer voters bribes in the form of spending programs and tax cuts. State funding would force taxpayers to pay the job-seeking expenses of politicians they would not vote for. The solution is to remove power from the politicians and return it to the people.

J. Preston Carter Grayslake, Ill.

The perils of watching TV alone

Regarding your articles "Among parents, backlash builds to Ritalin" (Oct. 6) and "TV tops list of cultural 'bad guys' " (Oct. 11): I wonder why no one seems to have made the connection between raising infants to sit in front of TV screens for hours and continuing to let them watch programs even in their own bedrooms with their own TVs.

Certainly, people of my generation saw cartoons and often violent movies of the gangster/cops and cavalry/Indian kind. But this was at movie theaters, not at home, lounging in familiar surroundings. And we did not do it for hours on end. Reality and what was on the screen could never be blended or confused because we emerged from that movie theater into bright sunlight or into a dark night filled with headlights, streetlights, and other people.

Today's parents are the TV generation, raising their children as they were raised, now with even more technological "toys." What is a hopeful sign is that they are beginning to complain and to ask questions.

Ernie Karsten Berkeley, Calif.

Pro wrestling approach to debates

In your Oct. 10 article "Can new format end the debate doldrums?" Alan Schroeder offers false optimism that a change of format would attract more viewers to the second presidential debate.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.