Baseball: the definitive autobiography of Ted Williams and 7 other noteworthy books

Here are excerpts from 7 noteworthy new books about baseball.

5. "Mover and Shaker: Walter O'Malley, the Dodgers, and Baseball's Westward Expansion"

By Andy McCue

University of Nebraska Press

488 pages

(Walter O'Malley, who owned the Dodgers from 1950 to 1979, was viewed as a visionary by some and a traitor by others for moving the team to Los Angeles in 1958. He was eventually elected to the Hall of Fame for his contributions to the game.) 

"The economics of Ebbets Field were pressing Walter O'Malley to find a solution, but the barriers were daunting. The Ebbets Field site [in Brooklyn] was too small to support a larger structure, and the possibility of closing McKeever Place [a street] behind third base, or some other bordering street, was deemed impractical. The projected cost figure he had for a new stadium was $6 million, and O'Malley's team did not have that kind of money, especially with the added burden of paying [Branch] Rickey for his share of the team.

"The publicity-conscious architect Norman Bel Geddes contacted O'Malley in 1948 and offered a design for a new stadium he said would seat 80,400 people.... O'Malley was very willing to listen to people with new ideas, and Bel Geddes had plenty of those.

... "In the spring of 1952 [Bel Geddes] was at Vero Beach at O'Malley's invitation to help design Holman Stadium [the centerpiece of the Dodgers' spring training complex]. But he was not talking about a spring training park for 5,000. He was talking about a downtown-Brooklyn retractable-roof stadium of the future. It would include foam-rubber seats, with heating elements for cold weather, a seven-thousand-car garage, hot dogs from vending machines (mustard included), and a 'synthetic substance to replace grass on the entire field and which can be painted any color.' "

5 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.