6 baseball books for midseason reading

Dig into a great read about baseball this summer! Here are some choices.

5. ’The Streak: Lou Gehrig, Cal Ripken Jr., and Baseball's Most Historic Record,’ by John Eisenberg

Despite the parallel storytelling about two of baseball’s greatest players, Lou Gehrig and Cal Ripken Jr., John Eisenberg, the author of “The Streak,” insists his book is not a biographical project. The real central character is the record that Gehrig held for 62 years before Ripken in 1995 broke the record for playing in the most consecutive games in major league history. Gehrig had once played in 2,130 games in a row. Ripken surpassed him by 502 games. While both are admirable “Iron Man” achievements, Eisenberg doesn’t leave things there. His interest is in examining a somewhat controversial milestone to, as he says, “hold the record up to the light, explore its history and underlying philosophy, to ask questions.”

Here’s an excerpt from The Streak:

“By the 1950s, consecutive-game streaks had become the oddball in the family of baseball feats – not a black sheep so much as a crazy, complicated cousin, beloved by some, irksome to others.

“On one hand, the public and many players viewed them as a worthwhile achievement. Five of the 15 longest streaks in history began or ended in the 1950s, and fans faithfully responded with swells of applause, appreciating the toughness and dedication required. Gehrig’s ‘Iron Man stunt’ was still a vivid memory, having ended not long ago. In deference to Gehrig, streaks were treated with respect.

“But they also had accumulated a set of detractors, skeptics who believed it was a silly, pointless goal, certainly an odd thing to become known for. Youngsters playing imaginary games in their backyards dreamed of hitting home runs and winning the World Series, right? They did not envision themselves simply playing in hundreds of games in a row.”

5 of 6

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.