Guest blog: Why I'm not sure I like the "co-author" concept(Read article summary)
Should it bother us readers when a series is written by a group of writers using a single name?
The blockbuster success of James Patterson’s books is so immense that one out of every 17 hardcover novels bought in the United States since 2006 has been written by him, according to a Sunday cover story in the The New York Times Magazine.
What drew my attention, even more than the staggering numbers, was being reminded that there’s an asterisk next to the “written by him.” At this point, the article said, Patterson uses co-authors on nearly all his books. Collaborators draft most chapters from a lengthy Patterson outline, with Patterson revising and rewriting when needed. (That’s how he managed to publish nine hardcovers in 2009, the article noted.)
From the gut, the idea of co-writers feels wrong. We like to think we are fans of an author, rather than a style of plotting. But I wonder if the rules are different for genre books and series books, so formulaic by nature.