What recovery? Top 10 cities losing jobs

For some regions of the US, talk of an economic recovery is more wishful thinking than reality. Here are the top 10 metropolitan areas that continue to struggle with unemployment, from the Carpet Capital of the World to the home of an Ivy League university.

5. Anderson, S.C.: -4.0 percent

Sefton Ipock/The Independent-Mail/AP
Kayla Riggins and David Gregory play on an inflatable raft in Hartwell Lake near the beach at Darwin Wright Park in Anderson, S.C. in this May 2012 file photo. This "upcountry" region has been shedding jobs lately, concentrated mainly in the service and state government sectors.

When an economist visited Anderson last December, he described the nation’s economic recovery as a barbecue: low and slow. He could have been talking about the Anderson metro itself. The only difference is that Anderson’s economy isn’t getting better on the spit – it’s just getting cooked. Located in the fast-growing “Upcountry” region of northwestern South Carolina, metro Anderson has been losing jobs: some 2,400 jobs in the latest reported 12-month period. That’s a 4.0 percent decline makes Anderson the fifth-worst metro in terms of job growth. Its job losses were concentrated in the service sector and in state government.

In some ways, its woes reflect South Carolina’s weaker-than-hoped-for economic growth, with weak employment indicators and mixed housing conditions. Statewide, the construction industry continues to struggle. South Carolina issued 10.4 percent fewer residential permits in April than in March, and housing prices decreased in the first quarter of 2012 – the fourteenth consecutive year-over-year decline in house prices.

There’s also a mismatch, some analysts say, between the manufacturing skills of residents who lost their jobs and the demands of the more technically advanced and less labor-intensive manufacturing plants moving in. On that front, at least, there’s some good news for Anderson. This month, CEL Chemical and Supplies announced it will establish a new $900,000 plant employing 15 workers to create and ship chemicals for the paperboard and chemical industries.

6 of 10

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.