Abercrombie & Fitch is back. Sort of.

Thanks to new management and different clothing designs, the company is starting to rebound. But it isn't all the way there yet.

|
Shannon Stapleton/Reuters/File
A woman walks by a discount sign at an Abercrombie & Fitch store at a shopping mall in Garden City, New York in 2014.

Abercrombie & Fitch may finally be finding its footing again.

On Wednesday, the clothing brand posted its first same store sales gain in three years and earnings of $1.08 a share, ahead of expected earnings of $0.99 per share. Net sales also grew more than expected, to $1.11 billion. Abercrombie stocks are now trading up, at $29.50 a share.

"Our results for the fourth quarter reflect continued progress on a number of fronts,” Arthur Martinez, Abercrombie Executive Chairman, said in a statement. “While we accomplished a lot, there is much more progress we need to make to fulfill the potential of our brands.”

It’s been a rough few years for the brand, which enjoyed wide popularity in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Consumers have moved away from its edgy advertisements and logo-laced clothes over the past decade.  

The company has faced weak sales, and controversy, for years. In 2014, CEO Mike Jeffries retired from the company and its board of directors. His 20-year tenure helped build the company into a brand for “cool” teenagers and young adults. But in 2013, Mr. Jeffries came under fire for implying that plus-size people are unwelcome at the store, thereby suggesting that that fun-loving, risqué image was meant only for certain individuals.

Abercrombie has also been dogged by hiring discrimination lawsuits. In 2004, the company settled a class-action lawsuit that charged it used discriminatory hiring practices against minority candidates. In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Muslim woman who had sought a job at an Abercrombie in Oklahoma, but was denied employment because of her hijab.

Jeffries’ 2014 retirement sent Abercrombie stocks sliding. Abercrombie immediately began to restructure, focusing on offering a consistent brand message. In order to unify its upper-level management, Abercrombie created six new positions in 2015 that organized its executives around the brand, rather than individual products. Those moves helped the company regain some ground among investors.  

Abercrombie’s marketing strategy has shifted just as drastically as its management structure. In a departure from the highly sexualized ad campaigns that were the brand's trademark, Abercrombie now requires its models to wear shirts, and has de-emphasized the models' physical appearance as a lure for selling clothes.

It has also started to shift the way it hires workers, no longer calling them "models."

Abercrombie’s clothing offerings have also started to evolve, too. It has substantially reduced inventory emblazoned with its once-prized logo in favor of more modern and subdued looks. This is a direct push to try and regain consumers who flocked to cheaper apparel stores like Forever 21, Zara, and H&M while Abercrombie was on the outs.      

Abercrombie isn’t out of the woods yet, but after years of stumbles, the brand may finally be on a more even keel.

“As we look ahead to 2016, it is likely to remain a challenging environment, but we believe we are on the right track,” Martinez said. “We will continue to focus on delivering a customer-centric shopping experience and compelling assortments based on clearly defined brand positions."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Abercrombie & Fitch is back. Sort of.
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/0302/Abercrombie-Fitch-is-back.-Sort-of
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe