President Obama's real proposal (and why it's risky)(Read article summary)
Obama said that his budget proposal would cut $4 trillion over the next 12 years. It's difficult to plan for a budget one or two years away, and it's downright unreasonable to plan one for 12 years from now.
Carolyn Kaster / AP
Paul Ryan says his budget plan will cut $4.4 trillion over ten years. The President says his new plan will cut $4 trillion over twelve years.
Letâ€™s get real. Ten or twelve-year budgets are baloney. Itâ€™s hard enough to forecast budgets a year or two into the future. Between now and 2022 or 2024 the economy will probably have gone through a recovery (Iâ€™ll explain later why I fear it will be anemic at best) and another downturn. America will also have been through a bunch of elections â€“ at least five congressional and three presidential.
The practical question is how to get out of the ongoing gravitational pull of this awful recession without cow-towing to extremists on the right who think the U.S. government is their mortal enemy. For President Obama, itâ€™s also about how to get reelected.
(Yes, we also have to send a clear signal to global lenders that America is serious about reducing its long-term budget deficit. But in truth, global lenders donâ€™t need much reassurance. Bond market yields in the U.S. are now lower than they were when the government was running a budget surplus ten years ago.)
Seen in this light, Obamaâ€™s plan isnâ€™t really a budget proposal. Itâ€™s a process proposal.
Stage 1, starting now and ending in June, requires that Republican and Democratic leaders devise a budget for 2012. Apparently theyâ€™ve already agreed to try.
That budget would also include a â€śframeworkâ€ť for deficit reduction over the longer haul. But that framework will be mainly for show. It will give House Republicans enough cover to vote to raise the ceiling on the amount the U.S. government can borrow. (The vote has to occur before the Treasury runs out of accounting maneuvers, in early July.)
And because the frameworkâ€™s details will be filled in after Election Day, it will give Obama wiggle room before the election to campaign on his priorities. If he wins big â€“ and if Democrats retake the House â€“ its details will look completely different from what theyâ€™d look like in the alternative.
Stage 2 occurs in 2014 â€“ fully two years after Election Day. Then, according to Obamaâ€™s proposal, if the ratio of the nationâ€™s deficit to the GDP hasnâ€™t fallen to 2.5 percent (itâ€™s now over 10 percent), automatic across-the-board cuts will go into effect to get it there.
Importantly, these cuts wouldnâ€™t apply to Social Security and Medicare, or to Medicaid and other programs designed for the poor. And they wouldnâ€™t be limited to spending. Theyâ€™d also apply to tax expenditures â€“ that is, to tax deductions and tax credits.
The betting in the White House is that by 2014 the recovery will be in full force, and the economy will have grown so much that the ratio of deficit to the GDP will be in the range of 3 to 5 percent anyway. That means any across-the-board cuts wouldnâ€™t have to be very deep.
The White House is also betting that a strong recovery will take the sting out of any recommendations to slow the growth of Medicare spending emanating from the Medicare board set up under the new health care law (officially known as the Independent Payment Advisory Board.) Under Obamaâ€™s new plan, such proposals will be necessary if Medicare spending grows .5 percent faster than growth of the economy (under the law, itâ€™s 1 percent faster).
All told, itâ€™s a clever strategy. It might well avoid a dangerous game of chicken over raising the debt ceiling. It still allows the President to charge Paul Ryan and other Republicans who join him as ending Medicare as we know it â€“ which they are, in fact, proposing to do. (This may help Democrats win back seniors, whose support for Democratic house candidates dropped form 49% in 2006 to 38% in 2010.) And it gives the President lots of room to maneuver between now and Election Day, and between Election Day and 2014.
But thereâ€™s one big weakness. The whole thing depends on the recovery picking up steam. If the economy doesnâ€™t, the process could backfire â€“ leading to indiscriminate budget cuts later on, as well as big cuts in Medicare. Indeed, if the recovery fails to fire up, Obamaâ€™s own chance of reelection is dimmed considerably, as are the odds of a Democratic House after 2012.
Yet what are the chances of a booming recovery? The economy is now growing at an annualized rate of only 1.5 percent. Thatâ€™s pitiful. Itâ€™s not nearly enough to bring down the rate of unemployment, or remove the danger of a double dip. Real wages continue to drop. Housing prices continue to drop. Food and gas prices are rising. Consumer confidence is still in the basement.
By focusing the publicâ€™s attention on the budget deficit, the President is still playing on the Republicanâ€™s field. By advancing his own â€śtwelve year planâ€ť for reducing it â€“ without talking about the economyâ€™s underlying problem â€“ he appears to validate their big lie that reducing the deficit is the key to future prosperity.
The underlying problem isnâ€™t the budget deficit. Itâ€™s that so much income and wealth are going to the top that most Americans donâ€™t have the purchasing power to sustain a strong recovery.
Until steps are taken to alter this fundamental imbalance â€“ for example, exempting the first $20K of income from payroll taxes while lifting the cap on income subject to payroll taxes, raising income and capital gains taxes on millionaires and using the revenues to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit up to incomes of $50,000, strengthening labor unions, and so on â€“ a strong recovery may not be possible.
The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.