Menu
Share
Share this story
Close X
 
Switch to Desktop Site

Federal revenues up: Where did the money come from?

(Read article summary)
View video

Congressional Budget Office / Bob Williams / Tax VOX

(Read caption) Federal revenues since 2000, broken out by source. All lines use the left axis except for total revenue, which uses the right axis. Individual income taxes and FICA decreased because of ongoing unemployment, but those were more than offset by increased corporate income taxes and Fed investments.

View photo

Federal revenues rose nearly 3 percent from fiscal year 2009 to FY2010. But virtually the whole increase came from higher corporate income taxes and a more than doubling of Federal Reserve earnings. Preliminary data in the Congressional Budget Office’s October Monthly Budget Review reveal that revenue climbed $57 billion to $2.16 trillion in the fiscal year that ended last month (see graph). Combined with a $67 billion fall in outlays, that revenue gain cut the federal deficit by $125 billion to a still astronomical $1.3 trillion, or 8.9 percent of GDP. Bad as that is, it’s well below 2009’s deficit of 10 percent of GDP.

Year-over-year revenue changes were highly uneven, however. Corporate income taxes jumped about 40 percent to $192 billion—up $54 billion from 2009—largely because profits rose but also because temporary provisions allowing firms to depreciate assets more rapidly expired. (Congress extended accelerated depreciation retroactively in September, but any tax savings won’t come until FY2011.) Federal Reserve receipts jumped more than 120 percent ($42 billion) on the Fed’s greatly expanded investment portfolio, mostly acquired to boost the economy and prop up the ailing housing market.

About these ads

But both individual income and social insurance taxes fell in FY2010-- fallout from continuing high unemployment. Income tax receipts were down 1.6 percent ($14 billion) and the taxes supporting Social Security and Medicare dropped more than 3 percent ($28 billion). Had these revenue sources held constant, the deficit would have shrunk another 0.3 percent of GDP.

Add/view comments on this post.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.