Menu
Share
 
Switch to Desktop Site

Maryland's millionaire exodus

(Read article summary)
Image

Jacquelyn Martin / AP

(Read caption) Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley speaks at rally at Bowie State University in Bowie, Md., on Oct. 7. Millionaires are leaving Maryland in response to Gov. O'Malley's efforts to increase their tax share.

About these ads

Expatriation. It’s happening. Thousands of people are picking up stakes and leaving. They’re leaving their high-tax home states.

“I’m outa here. I’ve had enough,” said a friend at dinner last week. “[Maryland Governor] O’Malley thinks he can tax us all he wants. But I don’t have to put up with it. I can move. We bought a place in Florida.

“He probably thinks it doesn’t matter. What’s a single taxpayer, more or less? That’s not going to change the outcome of an election. But I’m taking my business with me. I’ll set up shop in Florida. I don’t have to be in Maryland. I can get crab cakes in Miami too.”

What had set him off was an article in The Wall Street Journal. “Millionaires Go Missing: Maryland’s fleeced taxpayers fight back.”

The WSJ:

Governor Martin O’Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were “willing and able to pay their fair share.” The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would “grin and bear it.”

However, there were two things that Maryland politicians didn’t count on (1) a world-wide economic crisis decreasing the number of million dollar earners and (2) millionaires simply leaving (or taking in less income). “By April 2009, one-third of the millionaires have disappeared from Maryland tax rolls. On those missing returns, the government collects 6.25% of nothing. Instead of the state coffers gaining the extra $106 million the politicians predicted, millionaires paid $100 million less in taxes than they did last year – even at higher rates.

What the WSJ failed to mention was that 6.25% isn’t the end of it. There are local taxes too. And in Baltimore City and Montgomery County, for example, the additional local taxes bring the total take up to nearly 10%.

If you have $100,000 of taxable income, in other words, you pay almost $10,000 for the dubious privilege of living in Baltimore rather than, say, some low-tax city in the Sunbelt.

In our own business, we have an office in Baltimore and one in Florida. We can’t move our entire business to Florida, but more and more we hear from employees in Baltimore who want to move to Florida. So the business moves…organically, naturally. And when we create new businesses we put them in Florida, rather than in Maryland.

About these ads

We already see the results of this and similar policies in Baltimore. People who create wealth tend to live outside the city…or move out. In the city limits, zombies have taken over – with a high percentage of cities’ populations on government payrolls or various forms of welfare. They’re less interested in creating wealth than they are in redistributing it to the shuffling, mouth-breathing masses.

The city’s largest employer, for example, Johns Hopkins, is a private institution. And a great one, from what we’ve heard. But it is hardly independent of the zombies. Much of its research and operating budgets are funded by the government.

------------------------------

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here.


Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.

Loading...