Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

After Fannie and Freddie, a role for government in mortgages?

(Read article summary)

Molly Riley/Reuters/File

(Read caption) A sign in front of the Fannie Mae headquarters is photographed in Washington Feb. 11, 2011. The Obama administration has unveiled a plan to unwind the government-controlled mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

About these ads

The United States needs a new system for financing American homeownership. The old system collapsed in 2008 when skyrocketing losses forced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two mortgage giants, into federal conservatorship. Since then, the government has backed 9 of 10 new mortgages.

That support kept mortgage credit flowing during the darkest days of the financial crisis. But the US needs to get back to a system where private investors, rather than government, evaluate mortgage risks and provide credit to home buyers. To get there, we need to rethink government's participation in mortgage markets.

Start with the hardest question: Should government participate at all?

It's tempting to say no. Many parts of the economy work just fine without direct government support. Fannie and Freddie's primary business was securitizing middle-class mortgages, which in normal times are stable, predictable investments easily handled by the private sector.

But times aren't always normal. Our government would support the mortgage market again if another crisis developed, so a fully private system seems beyond political reality. If government involvement is a given, what should it look like?

First, any government role should be clear. Fannie and Freddie were masters of exploiting the old system. When speaking to their investors, the firms touted the security of their implicit taxpayer backing. When faced with calls for tighter oversight, however, they portrayed themselves as regular private firms. That ambiguity helped them take on big risks while ducking needed oversight.

Second, taxpayers shouldn't backstop trillion-dollar hedge funds. Fannie and Freddie's most prominent business is buying mortgages, pooling them together, and selling those pools to investors with a sweetener: a promise that the firms will cover any default losses. But the two firms also boosted profits by issuing debt and using the proceeds to buy mortgages and mortgage securities. That hedge-fund-like portfolio exposed taxpayers to needless risk.


Page:   1   |   2

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.