And fails. A few years ago I became an accidental education reformer, and learned that my Lone Ranger approach to change doesn't work so well. Inertia besets schools, but also individual parents. It takes a community to reform schools.
About five years ago, I had a brief stint as an education reformer. I was asked to critique a marketing brochure my school district in Cleveland Heights was using to explain to parents the new “Small Schools” initiative.
Our large, inner-ring high school was about to be broken into five small schools of about 400 kids each. Every school had its own name and educational philosophy. The “Renaissance School” promised collaborative discovery-based learning. The “Mosaic School” pitched a problem-solving based approach. And so on.
I asked teachers and administrators what parents and students needed to know in order to choose a school. Was personality and learning style the key? Were interests the most important: future engineers in this school, future novelists in that one? Turns out any kid could “thrive” in any school. All the schools taught basically the same curriculum. I was told these were philosophies, not tangible pedagogies. And besides, not every kid could choose her own school.
I proposed that they scrap the brochure and start over. They should talk instead about the real reform at hand, which was that your kid was going to be in a small school, where he would have strong personal relationships with teachers but still have exposure to all the extra-curricular and social experiences of a large, dynamic high school. Talk about the value of “small” rather than opaque educational philosophies.
Page 1 of 4