4 ways Chuck Hagel can improve cyber security

Newly sworn-in Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel must guide the Department of Defense through a few key challenges to better secure the nation’s cyber networks. His focus at the Pentagon should be on these four key areas.

4. Establish rules of international behavior

Hagel will need to establish a strong working relationship with Secretary of State John Kerry on a variety of issues, but there may be no more urgent issue than cyber security. Together, they must work with governments around the world to build transparent norms based on common principles, define protocols for watch and early-warning systems, and reduce behaviors that unintentionally escalate cyber incidents.

Additionally, non-state actors are now a major player in the cyber arena, often acting on behalf of governments and private clients. The US should work with partner governments to instill a culture where countries take responsibility for actions that take place within a their territories, without allowing “security” to become a pretense for cracking down on free speech and other fundamental values.

As Hagel assumes control of the Pentagon, he has a number of challenges before him. From the drawdown in Afghanistan to budgetary concerns, there are numerous threats to confront. Cyber threats are as complex as any he will face, but there are concrete steps he can take to improve American security.

Matthew Rhoades is the director of legislative affairs at the Truman National Security Project and the Center for National Policy.

4 of 4

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.