How the Parks Service is using DNA evidence to exonerate bears

When bears attack humans, wildlife officials have to put them down. Sometimes, however, the wrong bear ends up in the crosshairs.

|
Great Smoky Mountains National Park/AP
A female bear climbs a Chinese chestnut tree in Great Smoky Mountains National Park near Twin Creeks, Tenn. National Park Service rangers are employing modern forensic technology to make sure they don't kill the wrong bear when a human is attacked in the mountains.

In the United States’ criminal justice system, defendants are declared innocent until proven guilty.

And rangers with the National Park Service have decided this principle should apply to bears as well.  

When park employees and local park visitors learned that multiple bears were killed mistakenly in the last two years at the Great Smokey Mountains National Park, they were devastated. To alleviate these accidental kills, rangers at the 800-square mile park are now using Western Carolina University’s DNA lab to quickly analyze attack sites before killing a suspected bear. 

“We never want to kill a bear if we don’t have to,” NPS spokeswoman Dana Soehn told the Associated Press. “It’s the very symbol of the park.”

Previous forensic studies of bear attacks would take weeks to process, far longer than rangers could humanely hold a bear. But easy access to WCU’s DNA lab means faster results for park officials, and the park has established an agreement with the Knoxville Zoo to hold a bear if the results are taking longer than usual.

“One of the reasons why people come to the Smokies is for the opportunity to see a black bear in the wild,” adds Ms. Soehn. “So we know it’s a really special thing for them to see, and we want people to have that chance to see wild bears. But at the same time, we want them to be safe.”

But does pursuing capital punishment for past attackers really help keep people safe?

Chris Servheen, Montana’s grizzly bear recovery coordinator for the US Fish and Wildlife Service, tells The Chicago Tribune that there is a difference between bears with “natural aggression” and “unnatural aggression.” 

To begin with, says Mr. Servheen, the bears who attack humans are the outliers. Bears "have every ability to prey on us, but they're wary of us. Ninety-nine point nine percent of bears stay away from people, and that's how they survive," he adds. 

As for the offenders, many of the attacks can be attributed to humans, who either approach a bear without caution or knowingly aggravate the animal. But the rest of the guilty bears, those that attack more maliciously, show “unnatural aggression” and will likely attack again.

“They’ve preyed on something that’s vulnerable, they’ve been successful, and they’ve received a reward,” says Servheen. “And we don’t tolerate those cases at all.”

The ethics of bear "court" have been argued by hikers, conservationists, and park visitors alike. When Lance Crosby was killed in Yellowstone Park last year by a mother grizzly bear and her cubs, thousands voiced their opinion: some wanted revenge for Mr. Crosby’s death, while others argued that hikers in national parks enter bears’ territories at their own risk. 

And the push for DNA testing by rangers at Great Smokey Mountains National Park comes after a fatal incident in Montana when Brad Treat, a law enforcement officer with the US Forest Service, was killed by a grizzly bear while riding his bike near Glacier National Park Wednesday afternoon. 

To avoid bear attacks, experts recommend properly storing food, minimizing body scents, carrying bear or pepper spray, staying on designated paths, and traveling in groups. If a bear crosses your path, never run. 

This report contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to How the Parks Service is using DNA evidence to exonerate bears
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2016/0701/How-the-Parks-Service-is-using-DNA-evidence-to-exonerate-bears
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe