Can US solar energy compete with Germany's low prices?(Read article summary)
The growth of the US solar energy industry is impressive, Calhoun and Morris write, but so-called 'soft costs' keep solar prices high in the US, compared to countries like Germany, a champion of solar development.
A recent Deutsche BankÂ reportÂ projects global newly installed photovoltaic (PV) capacity will reach 50 GW annually in 2014, a roughly 50-percent increase over anticipated new installed capacity during 2013. Germanyâ€™s been the longtime undisputed champion of solar deployment, withÂ 35.2 GWÂ of installed capacity as of November 1, though the installation pace leadÂ has shifted in 2013 to Japan. But the U.S. is acceleratingâ€”and is expected to install 4.4 GW of solarÂ this year,Â about the same absolute amount as the JapaneseÂ andÂ more than the Germans.
This growth is impressive, but if the U.S. is to transition to the low-carbon, resilient, and sustainable electricity system of the future outlined in RMIâ€™sÂ Reinventing Fire, we need to install four times more solar capacity annually than weâ€™re currently doing, for the next forty-odd years, with most of the installs coming in the distributed market (residential and commercial rooftops). If weâ€™re going to do that, we need to make distributed solar cheaper, and do so quickly.Â
PV soft costs now dominate the equation
Between 2008 and 2012, the price of sub-10-kilowatt (mainly residential) rooftop systems decreased 37 percent. However, over 80 percent of that cost decline is attributed to decreasing solar PV module costs. With module and other hardware prices expected to level off in the coming years (and in the near term, actually increase), further market growth will be highly dependent on additional reductions in the remaining â€śBalance of Systemâ€ť costs, otherwise known as â€śsoft costs.â€ťÂ
Soft costs account for 50â€“70 percent of the total cost of a rooftop solar system in the U.S. today. These soft costs include installation labor; permitting, inspection, and interconnection; customer acquisition; andÂ other costsÂ (margin, financing costs, and additional fixed administrative and other transactional cost). Setting aside those â€śotherâ€ť costs, soft costs for U.S. residential systems are around $1.22 per watt of PV, while German soft costs average $0.33 per watt. Thatâ€™s one heck of a spread. How does Germany do it, and how can U.S. installers approach or even surpass those numbers?
Simple BoS project searches for answers
RMI and other groups such as the U.S. DOE, National Renewable Energy Lab oratory(NREL), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Clean Power Finance, and the Vote Solar Initiative have done great work on the issue over the past several years through benchmarking and other analysis on these various soft costs. However, such data remains relatively sparse in comparison to hardware market analysis. The U.S. solar industry has known that German installers are able to install rooftop solar systemsÂ at less than half our cost. But we havenâ€™t been able to discern, at the detailed level of specific worker actions, why. Until now.
RMI, in partnership withÂ Georgia Tech Research InstituteÂ (GTRI), launched a PV installation labor data collection and analysis effort under theÂ SIMPLE BoSÂ project, which culminated today in the release ofÂ Reducing Solar PV Soft Costs: A Focus on Installation Labor. Drawing upon first-hand observations, this report is the first publicly available detailed breakdown of the primary drivers of installation labor cost between German and U.S. residential installs.
The SIMPLE BoS team implemented a time-and-motion methodology for evaluating the PV installation process, collecting data on PV installations in both countries.
Ample opportunities to reduce installation costs
The results indicated that U.S. installers participating in the SIMPLE BoS project incur median installation costs of $0.49/W, compared to a benchmarked median cost of $0.18/W for participating German installers. Figure 2 (see left) shows the comparative costs of each component of the PV installation process in the U.S. and Germany, respectively, looking at four categories of installation-related costs: racking & mounting, pre-install, electrical, and non-production.
In addition to providing cost details on the PV installation process, our report outlines several enabling factors from German and leading U.S. installers that can be disseminated throughout the U.S. market. These opportunities range widely in complexity and impact, from redesigning the base installation process and preparing rails on the ground, to implementing a one-day installation process and PV-ready electrical circuits. Weâ€™ve shown in Figure 2 (see left) the potential impact in $/W of these solutions and how difficult it would likely be to implement them widely the U.S.
In addition to highlighting specific opportunities for cost reduction in the U.S., our report also draws upon collected data and analysis to outline one potential pathway for U.S. installers to reduce installation labor costs by up to 64%â€”potentially undercutting German installation labor costs when relative differences in wages are taken into account. This pathway will not be realized overnight. It requires serious product innovation, uniform adoption of best practices, and a move to one-day installations from the average 3â€“5-day installation process thatâ€™s common for U.S. installers today.
We hope this report and all follow-on work under theÂ SIMPLE BoS projectÂ will help the U.S. industry continue to reduce solar PV costs and enable the widespread, cost-effective deployment of residential solar PV systems.
For more information,Â download the full report.