Woodlands in developed world also absorb CO2. What will impact be on global climate talks?
The concept seems simple: Enlist key developing countries in the fight against global warming by paying them with carbon credits to not cut down their tropical forests. In international climate talks, the idea has gained a lot of traction.
But some forest ecologists are figuratively tugging on negotiators’ sleeves and saying: “Don’t forget forests at higher latitudes.” It may be time to give countries with large intact temperate and boreal (far northern) forests credit for forest preservation as well, they say.
It’s not clear how much traction this policy prescription could have. Whether and how to account for forests’ roles in slowing global warming – forests in wealthy, developed countries, that is – has long been contentious.
Giving developed countries a credit-for-preservation deal doesn’t erase the principle that different countries have different responsibilities for tackling climate change, says Sebastiaan Luyssaert, an ecologist at the University of Antwerp in Belgium. But “when primary forest landscapes provide much-needed services to mankind, this should be accounted for, irrespective of country.”
From the atmosphere’s perspective, “a pulse of CO2 has the same warming effect, irrespective of the GDP of the forest” from which it came, says Brendan Makey, an ecologist at the Australian National University in Canberra. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), “we need to be well below zero emissions by 2100,” he says. And in order to stabilize concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, “we do not have a choice ... but to halt emissions from deforestation and degradation – and in fact begin to restore the terrestrial carbon stock.”
Page 1 of 4