Kepler epitaph? Eight most intriguing finds of troubled telescope.

Kepler, the space telescope designed to help us find other Earth-like planets, is on the fritz. Scientists hope they will be able to fix it remotely, but if they can't, its brief, brilliant career could be over. Here are eight of its most important discoveries.

8. Kepler-62e: Getting closer

JPL-Caltech/Ames/NASA/File
This artist's rendering shows the relative sizes of new habitable-zone planets (from l.) Kepler-69c, Kepler-62e, Kepler-62f, compared with Earth.

If Kepler-22b was the first and most Earth-like planet-candidate found by Kepler, then two of the planets in the Kepler-62 system represent a further refinement.

Like Kepler's first "Goldilocks" find, Kepler-62e and 62f are in their star's habitable zone, which is closer to the star than ours because Kepler-62 is only two-thirds the size and mass of our sun. The planet Kepler-62e makes an orbit once every 122 days, while 62f makes an orbit every 267 days.

Both are also larger than Earth: 62e is 60 percent larger while 62f is 40 percent larger. Current models suggest that planets more than 50 percent larger than Earth tend to be more watery, leading to speculation that 62e might be an ocean world. Meanwhile, models of 62f suggest it might be rocky, though both are too far away to get an accurate mass estimate, which would offer clues as to their composition.

For its part, 62f is on the outer edge of the habitable zone, meaning it would likely need to have a strong greenhouse effect to be warm enough for liquid water and life.

The discovery of these planets, along with a super-Venus in the Kepler-69 system, were announced in April. Kepler-69c is 70 percent larger than Earth and is dubbed a "super-Venus" because, like Venus, it is on the inner edge of its star's habitable zone.

8 of 8

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.