Switch to Desktop Site

Earth is less of a backwater than we thought, say astronomers

The galactic spiral arm where our solar system resides may be a big deal after all, according to a new analysis.


At left, the 'old' model of the Milky Way and our place in it. At right, the 'new' model, in which our solar system's Local Arm is a more prominent branch of the Perseus Arm.

Robert Hurt, IPAC; Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF

About these ads

Astronomers seem to delight in reminding us of our unimportance. Our planet, they're constantly telling us, is a backwater, a tiny speck circling an ordinary star on the boring periphery of a middling galaxy.

The astronomer Carl Sagan was the undisputed master of taking us down billions and billions of notches. Here he is in his 1980 book, Cosmos, doing his very best to make us feel completely insignificant:  

"For as long as there been humans we have searched for our place in the cosmos. Where are we? Who are we? We find that we live on an insignificant planet of a humdrum star lost in a galaxy tucked away in some forgotten corner of a universe in which there are far more galaxies than people." 

Are you scientifically literate? Take our quiz Are you scientifically literate? Take our quiz

For those of you whose self-esteem is linked to your proximity to the center of the universe, this is depressing stuff. We're living, it seems, in the cosmic equivalent of flyover country.

Or maybe not. New research shows that our planet might not be quite the provincial, iceberg-lettuce-eating exurbia that astronomers once thought. A new suggests that our galactic neighborhood is actually a pretty vibrant place.


Page:   1   |   2   |   3