What genome of ancient Ethiopian skeleton tell us about reverse migration

DNA extracted from the skeleton of a man who lived in Ethiopia 4,500 years ago reveals how early humans mingled and migrated between continents.  

|
Kathryn and John Arthur/Courtesy via Reuters
The entrance to the Mota cave in the Ethiopian highlands, where the remains containing the ancient genome were found.

An ancient skeleton of an Ethiopian man has given researchers clues about human migration back into Africa some 3,500 years ago. 

DNA retrieved from the 4,500-year-old skeleton suggests a large migration of people from the ancient Middle East into the Horn of Africa, researchers say in a new study, published in Science.

The skeleton unearthed from the Mota Cave in the Ethiopian Highlands has allowed researchers a rare glimpse into ancient African DNA. In recent years researchers have been able to isolate pieces of the genomes of European Neanderthals in modern humans and study the genes of prehistoric herders from Asia and Paleoindians from the Americas, but Africa's humid climate left little ancient DNA for scientists to find. “Africa was left out of the party,” says anthropological geneticist Jason Hodgson of Imperial College London.

Africa is considered to be the cradle of humanity and the staging ground for humans migrations around the world. But, the researchers say, these remains show that DNA from humans on a reverse-migration back to Africa reached deep into the continent, spreading even to groups considered isolated, such as the Khoisan of South Africa and the pygmies of the Congo. 

“Roughly speaking, the wave of West Eurasian migration back into the Horn of Africa could have been as much as 30 per cent of the population that already lived there – and that, to me, is mind-blowing,”  Dr. Andrea Manica, senior author of the study from the University of Cambridge’s Department of Zoology told the Telegraph.

“The question is: what got them moving all of a sudden?”

In the study, the researchers compared this ancient genome with modern samples. They found that up to one quarter of African DNA has come from interbreeding with Western Eurasians. While those in the far west and south of the continent still have at least five percent of them traceable to the Eurasian migrants.

"The claim that all sub-Saharan Africans today have a substantial amount of ancestry due to back-to-Africa migrations is quite interesting, and while I won't be 100% convinced until I look at the data myself, I think the analyses seem careful and thoughtful,” Prof David Reich, from Harvard Medical School told the BBC.

"While previous studies have documented substantial West Eurasian ancestry in some sub-Saharan African populations, including Nigerians and Khoisan from southern Africa, if the findings of this paper are right, they are important because they extend these claims to populations that were previously thought to have little or no West Eurasian ancestry, for example Mbuti hunter gatherers from central/east Africa," he added.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to What genome of ancient Ethiopian skeleton tell us about reverse migration
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2015/1009/What-genome-of-ancient-Ethiopian-skeleton-tell-us-about-reverse-migration
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe