The high court will decide if execution for a Louisiana child rapist is constitutional.
Thirty years ago the US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision, declaring that sentencing someone to death for the crime of rape was cruel and unusual punishment.
The decision referred to the rape of an adult woman, but it left an issue unresolved. What if the victim is a young girl? Can the government execute a child rapist?
Thirty years later, the Supreme Court is about to answer that question. The justices on Wednesday will hear the case on behalf of a Louisiana death-row inmate convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter in 1998.
The case is being closely watched because it may offer insight into the future direction of the high court's death-penalty jurisprudence. "The trend has been toward restriction [by the Supreme Court] of the number of people who are eligible for capital punishment," says John Blume, director of the Death Penalty Project at Cornell University Law School in Ithaca, N.Y.
At the same time, the number of death sentences imposed and the number of executions are both down. "There seems to be an increased public sentiment not necessarily to get rid of the death penalty, but to restrict its use," Professor Blume says.
A high court ruling upholding the Louisiana death sentence for child rape would buck that trend.
At issue in Patrick Kennedy v. Louisiana is the constitutionality of a Louisiana law authorizing capital punishment for the rape of a child under age 12. Lawyers for the state defend the statute, saying child rapists inflict lifelong injuries on the most vulnerable members of society.