Share this story
Close X
Switch to Desktop Site

First Guantánamo military tribunal under Obama gears up

A military judge ruled Monday that statements made by Omar Khadr, who is charged of killing a US soldier in Afghanistan, can be used in the trial, which is set to start Tuesday. Mr. Khadr's lawyers say the statements were coerced.

In this courtroom sketch, Canadian defendant Omar Khadr (l.) attends the first day of his hearing in the courthouse for the US military tribunal at Guantánamo Bay US Naval Base in Cuba August 9.

Janet Hamlin/Pool/Reuters

About these ads

A military judge on Monday ruled that self-incriminating statements made to US interrogators could be admitted as evidence in the war crimes trial of an Al Qaeda operative accused of murdering an American soldier in Afghanistan.

The ruling came in a special courtroom at the US Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, where officials are preparing for the first contested military commission trial of the Obama presidency. It is scheduled to begin on Tuesday.

Facing trial is Omar Khadr for allegedly throwing a hand grenade that killed a US special forces soldier and partially blinded another after a firefight near Khost, Afghanistan, in July 2002.

Mr. Khadr was 15 years old at the time. He denies throwing the grenade.

His lawyers object to the commission trial, saying that because of his young age at the time of his capture he should be treated as a child soldier who is not fully responsible for his actions.

They also argued that he faced brutal mistreatment and threats of rape by US interrogators and that any statements he made to military officials should not be used against him at trial.

Prosecutors countered that Khadr was not mistreated and that statements he made accepting responsibility for the grenade attack were not coerced.


Page 1 of 4

Follow Stories Like This
Get the Monitor stories you care about delivered to your inbox.