San Diego mayor faces sex harassment lawsuit, city faces uncertainty

San Diego Mayor Bob Filner is being sued by his former communications director for sexual harassment. He has resisted calls to resign, saying he will defend himself 'vigorously.'

|
Sam Hodgson /Reuters
Irene McCormack Jackson, the mayor's former director of communications and plaintiff in a sexual harassment lawsuit against San Diego and its mayor, Bob Filner, speaks during a press conference in San Diego Monday.

San Diego Mayor Bob Filner's former communications director has filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against him, creating new problems for a city that has struggled with recent civic scandals.

Though Mayor Filner has acknowledged “personal frailties,” he says the claims are not valid and he intends to fight them in court.

Since President Clinton survived attempts to drive him from office, some politicians have increasingly sought to ride out sex-related scandals. But such scandals often only damage both the politicians embroiled in them and the constituencies they serve, experts say.

“The longer the mayor hangs on, the political problem worsens for him and for the city long-term,” says David McCuan, a political scientist at Sonoma State University in Rohnert Park, Calif. “The longer he holds out, the harder it will be to rebuild faith in the most public of offices – that of mayor of a big city.”

Irene McCormack Jackson filed the lawsuit against Filner Monday. She is represented by Gloria Allred, the attorney for several high-profile clients, including Sharon Bialek, who accused then-GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain of sexual harassment, as well as Rachel Uchitel, one of Tiger Woods’s mistresses.

“I am coming forward today to lay the blame at the feet of the person responsible, Mayor Bob Filner,” Ms. McCormack Jackson said after detailing what she described as the mayor's harassment of her. “He is not fit to be mayor of our great city. He is not fit to hold any public office.”

McCormack Jackson said Filner asked her to “work without her panties on,” placed her in a headlock “and moved around as a ragdoll while he whispered sexual comments in my ear,” and said he wanted to have sex with her, among other alleged incidents.

“Women were viewed by Mayor Filner as sexual objects or stupid idiots,” said McCormack Jackson, a former reporter who resigned from her position as communications director in June. “His behavior made me feel ashamed, frightened, and violated.”

Filner responded to McCormack Jackson’s allegations in a statement late Monday.

“I do not believe these claims are valid,” Filner said. “That is why due process is so important. I intend to defend myself vigorously and I know that justice will prevail.” Despite having admitted on the air to Univision that he “brought this on through my own personal frailties,” Filner has resisted calls to resign.

The president of the San Diego Regional Economic Development Authority has said that the scandal has already been a distraction; Filner reportedly had to cancel an Asia trip. But others have survived similar allegations. For example, just before California’s high-profile 2003 California recall election, then-candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger was able to brush away claims from several women that he had groped them.

Mr. Clinton's political survival during the Monica Lewinsky scandal was a game-changer, says Jack Pitney, professor of government at Claremont McKenna College.

“When news of the Lewinsky affair broke, many people assumed that [Clinton] would have to quit. But through sheer tenacity or shamelessness – take your pick – he hung on,” he says. “Ever since, his example has been a source of encouragement to public figures facing accusations of sexual misconduct.”

But he suggests Filner is in danger because his situation is different.

“Clinton and Schwarzenegger were able to turn the issue around by blaming political foes for making unfair attacks,” Professor Pitney says. “In this case, the accusations against Filner come from people who were recently political allies.”

Moreover, he adds, “Hillary Clinton and Maria Shriver stood by their men. Filner's fiancée not only dumped him, but joined the ranks of his critics. Clinton and Schwarzenegger could draw on deep reserves of charm and goodwill.”

America's eighth-largest city is no stranger to political problems. In 2004, details emerged of financial dealings going back over 20 years that brought the city to the brink of bankruptcy. Among the criticized moves: selling public land, "corporate welfare" deals with major sports teams, misappropriation of funds, and the underfunding of basic services such as police, fire, and parks. A widening gap in city pension funds helped the city earn national headlines as an "Enron by the sea." The budget woes drew national scrutiny and investigations by the FBI, the US Attorney General's office, and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Then, earlier this year, Maureen O’Connor – San Diego’s first woman mayor, who served from 1986 to 1992 – confessed that she had diverted millions of her husband’s money to cover gambling debts.

“Those who live in San Diego are saying thank goodness for Sea World and the world famous zoo, because those are the lenses through which most people see the city,” says Pitney. “They don’t see it as a political town and, in this case, that definitely helps diminish any taint that might emerge from this.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to San Diego mayor faces sex harassment lawsuit, city faces uncertainty
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2013/0723/San-Diego-mayor-faces-sex-harassment-lawsuit-city-faces-uncertainty
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe