Why Sanders and Clinton are fighting over the word 'progressive'

As the Democratic Party leans harder to the left in 2016, it's more than just semantics at stake in the war of words between the party's front-runners.

|
Mic Smith/AP
Democratic presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton (left) and Senator Bernie Sanders (right) talk over each other during a primary debate at the Gaillard Center in Charleston, S.C. Jan. 17, 2016.

As they get ready for their first one-on-one debate Thursday night in New Hampshire, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are fighting about which one of them best embodies the word “progressive.”

Senator Sanders began this tussle over the nature of political identity on Wednesday by saying Mrs. Clinton “just wasn’t a progressive” on a host of issues, while campaigning in the Granite State. As a senator she’d voted to authorize the Iraq War, he pointed out – hardly an example of left-leaning values. The Vermont senator and avowed democratic socialist also pointed out that Clinton has taken lots of campaign money from Wall Street and has a super PAC, two things of which he’s never been accused.

Clinton during her own campaign stops responded that Sanders isn’t a “gatekeeper” on who can claim the “P” label. She’s a “progressive who gets things done” she argued – better poised to actually implement her agenda if elected president.

Why are they tussling over nomenclature? One reason might be because the Democratic Party has shifted left in recent years and Clinton, as well as Sanders, needs to pay attention to that end of the ideological spectrum.

Fully 47 percent of Democrats identify as socially liberal and economically liberal or moderate, according to Gallup Poll data. That’s an increase of 8 percentage points since Barack Obama ran for his first term in 2008, and an increase of 17 percentage points since 2001.

There are still plenty of across-the-board moderates, and even a few self-described conservatives, in Democratic ranks. But “Democratic candidates for the 2016 presidential nomination face a significantly more left-leaning party base than their predecessors did over the last 15 years,” wrote Gallup editor-in-chief Frank Newport last June.

And the word “progressive” remains a better choice for a Democratic presidential aspirant than “liberal,” given the attitudes of the US electorate as a whole.

The context in which Sanders and Clinton are discussing the word makes clear they view it as close to a synonym for “liberal.” Sanders’s single-payer health care plan and proposal to make college free are things that would have been called liberal in decades past.

But the overall US reaction to “progressive” is far more positive than to the word “liberal,” though the data here is a few years old. Sixty-seven percent of Americans view “progressive” as a positive term, Pew Research found in 2011. Only 50 percent said the same thing about “liberal.”

Interestingly, Democrats were equally positive about both labels. The difference was almost entirely among Republicans. A 55 percent majority of GOP respondents approved of “progressive,” while 70 percent of Republicans had a negative response to the “L” word.

Thus it’s possible a Democrat could boast of being progressive without offending many Republicans. But a socialist? Probably not. The Pew data showed 60 percent of Americans giving a thumbs-down to “socialism.”

Of course, Sanders talks about European-style democratic socialism, and not socialism in the sense of the state owning the means of production.

“I’m sure GOP attack ads will take that distinction into careful consideration,” writes David Roberts at Vox, tongue firmly in cheek, in a piece on what a Republican general election strategy against Sanders might look like.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why Sanders and Clinton are fighting over the word 'progressive'
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Decoder/2016/0204/Why-Sanders-and-Clinton-are-fighting-over-the-word-progressive
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe